<p>I already claimed it’s my own sample of NY natives I talked to,
and every of my own USC friends in NY.</p>
<p>Maybe someone else knows 30 friends sample from Ethiopia,
and they all somehow know SC.</p>
<p>That’s fair to some respect, because that’s what SC was more of
until reforming 10 years ago –> a rich safety jock school to Ivy, can’t dispute much
on that, though Ivy’s safety’s still no shame by any means.
That’s why the past 60-year America’s stereotype still hangs on so
strong the past 10 years, even as a “spoiled” joke
on McCain’s presidential election speech, since his wife’s SC alum.</p>
<p>But unfair’s that one would wonder why not any other school in US top-100
received near as much such “ubiquitous-bash-labeling”. UCLA’s “hardpush-promotion”
probably has the most to contribute on this due to bloody-feud in sports.</p>
<p>Either way don’t think even with national/internl recognition of SC’s ESPN big name
has anything to do with this ranking here on research recognition.</p>
<p>[List</a> of Nobel laureates by university affiliation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia](<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_university_affiliation]List”>List of Nobel laureates by university affiliation - Wikipedia)
Even Florida State has 6. Florida has 2.<br>
East Coast Mirror of Rich Spoiled Party Safety BostonU has 4.
This IS objective data on research and faculty,
though it simply counts Nobels and not overall research.</p>
<p>With the $money and determination SC has,
and its prime centre of LA location, it has to improve sooner.</p>