Let me edit my response so that it makes better sense.
Yes they do, as per my notes. I didn’t print the salaries by major because it’s in the link, but you can filter for UCLA and look at their salaries by years out of school.
I just edited and included the history majors salaries at the 2, 5, 10, and 15 year intervals. These include grad school, presumably law school {for} History, Sociology, Polisci majors, and the CSU website does the same. {Edit III: Forgot that square brackets around individual words will have a stealthy effect on what’s included in it.}
[Although there are a lot UCLA grads whose professions don’t come close to what they studied as undergraduates, and it’s not restricted necessarily from, e.g., their being social-science majors and their gravitating, say to business school, or medical school, or even something like their being SWEs.]
For 10 years later, do they account for who pursued further schooling vs who didn’t. UCLA (or the others) may or may not be the terminal school.
Edit 2: No, both the terminal BA/BS grads and those who received grad degrees are mixed together. This is why you see a big jump in average salary by majors in the social sciences. This isn’t Payscale or some other service that does delineate {between the two sets of grads}. In fact, of course, UCLA is predominantly not not the terminal school, e.g., for the Bio majors, who attended medical, dental, pharmacy school. Additionally, most UCLA grads attend grad school.
And location of where the students live - are salaries adjusted for that ?
Edit 1: No the UC and CSU salary information are not adjusted for where they live. Sorry, yes, salaries are greatly affected by location with CA’s being pretty high. And UCB’s salaries are about $30k/year higher than UCLA’s because more of its grads work in the higher COL Bay.