<p>
</p>
<p>Concur, but the OP did not ask for a response to that issue. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>[Undergraduate</a> Program - Main Page- Health Professions at SFSU](<a href=“http://userwww.sfsu.edu/~brothman/undergradindex.html]Undergraduate”>http://userwww.sfsu.edu/~brothman/undergradindex.html)</p>
<p>
[quote]
but as a native Californian, I can say that most natives know the “tiers” that exist within the UC and Cal States…[/qjuote]</p>
<p>Also concur.</p>
<p>
[quote]
However, no Calif med school is going to equate CSULB with CSULA…or CSUFullerton with CSUMBay…[.quote]</p>
<p>Strongly disagree, but my opinion doesn’t matter. Prestigious professional schools – and UCSF is one of the most prestigious – prefer kids from prestigious undergrads. Those Cal State grads are competing for a slot in UCSF, their top public, against the likes of grads from Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton, MIT, Caltech, USC,…and every other top private college (it doesn’t matter if its top 25 or top 50, as long as they are California residents). With all of those high achieving kids from which to choose, why would UCSF make a distinction between Cal States? Besides not being worth their time, it would be not be politically smart – the Regents still fund a portion of the professional schools’s budgets. Even if UCSF admissions believed in their heart of hearts that SFSU was better than say, a mid-tier UC, they cannot show such favoritism. On the contrary, the UCs look to geographic diversity across the state.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>And yeah, they do.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yes, but isn’t the #1 feeder to Harvard med Harvard College? (I think I read somewhere that something like a 20 of the class?) Ditto Harvard Law?</p>