<p>
</p>
<p>Actually, a lot of the assessments on this forum are quite accurate. Saying ‘you have a shot at Yale’ is different from saying ‘you are going to be admitted’. As an ostensibly well-read person on law school admissions data, did you not scrutinize the chart on Yale’s website? A cursory glance would have yielded the same conclusion as akafizzle’s. </p>
<p>This, however, assumes you can read. I am not sure as to the verity of that assumption.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>If you call that a proof, then you are in need of disabuse.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>No. I corrected your statements, which were misleading. Your correcting of ‘effect’ made no contribution, either, especially since the poster’s use of ‘affect’ was correct, and you merely exposed yourself as a wiseacre.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I cannot be offended by intellectual inferiors. </p>
<p>I truly hope the school to which you transfer teaches you a good lesson in logic. While I may need a course on maturity, you are in desperate need of one on reasoning.</p>