@twoinanddone I agree, too. I also don’t think that research grants should be considered scholarship $$ and taxed at the same rate.
@cptofthehouse I am not disagreeing that it hurts poor students. I don’t know how to more clearly state that I wonder about the numbers used in the article. The article didn’t explain anything about the process of the old compared to the new. It simply stated 37%. As far as being informative, it isn’t. The old formula hurt poor students as well. I imagine that a student with $15,000 in excess scholarship $$ having to pay 10% on $12900 was hit hard in coming up with that $$. The way scholarship $$ is taxed didn’t make sense before.