<p>yeah, unkown i wouldnt worry…plus, there’s always the appeals process just in case they accidentally made a mistake. but id be surprised if you arent accepted initially…</p>
<p>kevintech,</p>
<p>In my experience, being able to see a fin aid package does mean acceptance, but I cannot say with 100% authority that the relationship is always true.</p>
<p>so how bout those other UC’s. LA and Berkeley get too much hype around here :D</p>
<p>what’s everyones 2nd or 3rd options?
Im thinking Santa Barbara for myself. Then maybe Davis.</p>
<p>My mom picked up the mail this afternoon and e-mailed me at work when she saw the small (but thick, she pointed out) envelope from UCLA. Unfortunately, I did not file a FAFSA, and therefore am ineligible for the scholarship anyway. Paying for college is so frustrating when your family makes enough that you can’t get financial aid, but not enough that college isn’t insanely expensive.</p>
<p>i wish i’m the type of guy who is content with checking ucla site once: just before the due date of SIR. just imagine… u submit ur update and spend three months listening to classical music, in perfect bliss and ignorance…</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I am non-tap and I can see it. I have a 3.65 at UCI. applied as Econ.</p>
<p>I can see it, non-tap, applied for fa before mar 2, 3.8 physiological science major.</p>
<p>
we don’t know that for sure</p>
<p>Ok lostincode, now you’re getting into logic.</p>
<p>Absense of evidence doesnt mean evidence of absense!</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>You’re right. We don’t. There is the possibility that it does. But it does not NECESSARILY mean you have been rejected.</p>
<p>Err on the side of waiting for a definite answer.</p>
<p>from the evidences we have, we can assume beyond resonable doubt that</p>
<p>see finaid –> accepted</p>
<p>so ~accepted –>~see finaid</p>
<p>but we cannot conclude whether ~see finaid –> ~accepted or not</p>
<p>How can you log on to the financial aid site? what’s the password and id</p>
<p>kevintech, i don’t what u’re talking about, but i do know that in logic, unless it is proven false, it is true. sort of like unless proven guilty, then innocent.</p>
<p>i say we just wait…its less than 72 hours until ucla.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>sauron, I never know what you’re talking about. </p>
<p>But just becuase you can’t prove somethign false, doesn’t make it true.</p>
<p>Back then, they couldn’t prove the world wasn’t flat; that did not make it true.</p>
<p>You sure you know any logic?</p>
<p>i really wouldn’t get your hopes up that this whole finaid thing means we’re accepted. no one has been given an actual award yet, something that im assuming doesn’t happen until after they release decisions. plus, if they already made this many decisions, why wouldn’t they just start releasing them? after all, 4/23 is “late april.” i guess i just dont wanna get my hopes up, if i end up getting rejected. :(</p>
<p>I hope we actually get UCLA notices in a couple of days. I fear “rolling” admissions into mid May. I believe UCLARI said he didnt get his until May. </p>
<p>Sigh</p>
<p>UCLAri, what do you think of the TAP scholarship I and another on this board were urged to apply for? Would it be fair to take that as some good news?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>because they set a date for the release of decisions lol… the 26th.</p>
<p>around 2 1/2 to 3 days to go!</p>