US News Peer Assessment Rating Controversy At Clemson Part III

<p>Cambridgereptile:</p>

<p>It’s all about selection criteria. The University of California has concluded from studies it has conducted that high school grades are much better predictors of college performance than the SAT, which you may recall was invented to test INNATE intelligence among historically non-feeder schools to Harvard in the early 1950s.</p>

<p>Evidently the UC thinks DEMONSTRATED classroom performance is a better selection criterion for its incoming classes than SAT scores…</p>

<p>Kinds sucks for really smart lazy people.</p>