<p>^ Defending against false accusations, certainly.</p>
<p>As for the suggestion that educating internationals is “damaging,” I disagree. </p>
<p>First of all, some do stay; a smaller percentage than in the past, perhaps, as economic opportunities now abound in their home countries; but some do stay. Second, there are long-term benefits to increased international understanding, as well as a more educated global workforce creating a rising tide of prosperity that if properly managed should lift all boats. Third, there may be more direct payoffs to the local economy, as university alumni networks and old school friendships spread across international boundaries, expanding two-way opportunities for transboundary trade, investment, and business deals of all kinds. Simply put, the state of Minnesota is almost certainly better off economically due to the relationships that current Minnesota residents have with old school chums in China, and to the receptiveness of the University’s rather impressive alumni network in China when Minnesota businesspeople come calling; that kind of goodwill is invaluable, especially in places like China where so much business depends on networks of personal contacts and bonds of trust. And finally, I truly do believe that the opportunities to interact with and learn from international students enriches the educational experience of all the U.S. students attending the University; it’s a better and a stronger school for it, and that helps everyone who attends.</p>