<p>my mother-in-law (88) lives in Leisure World in SoCal, and says “everyone” thinks Bush is great there. She can’t even talk to her neighbors. A lot of them are retired folks who made their money in defense industries.</p>
<p>Bush is a good guy, just some stuff went wrong and impeaching him would be the dumbest i ever heard of.</p>
<p>trivia. Vermont is the state with the most Iraq casualties.
would that be a prominent reason for Vermont to appose Bush so severely ?</p>
<p>“Stuff went wrong”???</p>
<p>It’s called willful malfeasance.</p>
<p>I don’t think impeaching Bush will solve anything either, since Cheney is the true evil mastermind.</p>
<p>i agree, only not on the bit about Cheney. He isn’t evil… Bin Laden and Ahmadinejad are evil.
Cheney is just a (fill in your own politically correct and polite term to demean him).</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Reagan?? Nah…let’s go back a little further to when I was young (in middle school, to be exact)…the level of frustration that I see (and share)now rival that of the Watergate era. Never, ever, did I think that, in my lifetime, this country would elect an president so incompetent that he would make Richard Nixon look good by comparison.</p>
<p>I don’t think I’ve heard anyone call Richard Nixon incompetent before. Lots of other adjectives, but not incompetent.</p>
<p>^Actually, that was what I was getting at, though I wasn’t quite clear in my post.:o </p>
<p>Nixon, however corrupt and sinister, WAS actually competent, on many fronts–after all, he reopened relations with mainland China, pursued detente with the Soviet Union, etc.</p>
<p>Bush and (especially) Cheney, et al–are not only nefarious, but also grossly incompetent, all in one ugly package.</p>
<p>Yes, momonthehill - I agree. Both with your comments about Nixon, and the <em>package!</em> LOL!!</p>
<p>^Lol, guess I need to choose my words a bit more carefully.</p>