<p>Right, because all the criticism was in response to this thread… Oh wait it isn’t. My only response on this thread was to point out the hilarious hypocrisy in the university’s fund raising battle cry. </p>
<p>The only reason I then went point by point was because rjk went ahead to equate me to drew sharp. I went on to explain my disagreement with the university is well defined in scope and constant, backed by observable facts and statistics. But of course you do what you do best; misrepresent and ridicule any opinions that could be construed as negative for the university despite being factual, because obviously michigan is flawless and perfect and how dare anyone dissent from that opinion, seriously?</p>
<p>And then you of course illogically equate billionaires donating as them thinking the university is perfect. I am obviously in the 99th percentile when it comes to cumulative donation from an alumni below 30, but the university is obviously not without flaws in my eyes. Unlike you, my mind is not simple and binary. I can understand that something is good and bad at the same time. I am sure the billionaire that manages berkshire hathaway is capable of intellectual processing of this sort as well.</p>