***Volunteering?!***

<p>The good news is that you can list your hours w/o proof at almost all schools. The bad news is it won’t really matter, even if you pile up 50 hours or 500 hours.</p>

<p>You can look at the Common Data Set filing for most colleges and out of the 4 categories most will check either the lowest 2, “not considered” or “considered”. Since they’re not important most colleges aren’t going to make a big deal out of it. Proof or not, it won’t really matter. </p>

<p>For very selective colleges where ECs matter, just volunteering some time is not the kind of EC that competitive applicants have. So listing hours isn’t something they’re going to bother checking because even if true it won’t really help your app. Once again, those hours don’t matter.</p>

<p>The question about impressive EC’s comes up regularly on the forum. There is a thread with several posts by Northstarmom, a Ivy alum interviewer, about what constitutes impressive ECs from the point of view of the most selective colleges. The post is at <a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/what-my-chances/210497-those-ecs-weak-so-what-s-good.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/what-my-chances/210497-those-ecs-weak-so-what-s-good.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>As you will see from that link, at the most selective colleges they are looking for depth more than just participation. Stanford, for example, says

</p>

<p>2 very interesting articles about ECs that stand out and how to get them (same author, different examples) are at [How</a> to Be Impressive](<a href=“http://calnewport.com/blog/2008/05/28/the-art-of-activity-innovation-how-to-be-impressive-without-an-impressive-amount-of-work/]How”>The Art of Activity Innovation: How to Be Impressive Without an Impressive Amount of Work - Cal Newport) and [Save</a> This Grind?](<a href=“http://calnewport.com/blog/2008/09/12/case-study-how-could-we-save-this-ridiculously-overloaded-grind/]Save”>Case Study: How Could We Save This Ridiculously Overloaded Grind? - Cal Newport) I don’t buy into his underlying explanation of why they are impressive, but take a look at these 2 articles and I think you’ll get some original ideas.</p>