<p>
</p>
<p>While I do not think the USNews has the ambition to do that, one could use the “expected graduation rate” as one measure --despite it counter-intuitive use by USNews in the ranking methodology. Others could point in the general direction of the alumni giving as a proxy for the “happiness” of its alumni. </p>
<p>But again, I am NOT saying the USNews pays much attention to anything else than the “input” metrics and ignores outputs. My point was (and is) that Birgeneau could have used a number of more accurate elements in his hyperbolic appraisal of the ARWU. For instance, nobodu could have criticized a statement about the academic reputation and awards earned by the senior faculty at Cal and the staff who makes a living leading the research at its ancillary facilities. </p>
<p>And, of course, the above statement is STILL fueled by my strong belief that Nobel and similar prizes do little to nothing for the overwhelming majority of the students who attend Cal. Just like taking the football trophy home, it flatters one’s ego in a very intangible way. </p>
<p>Back to our regular programming!</p>