Weight loss surgery

<p>to dmd77 - I like your thinking and I totally agree that this surgery should be LAST resort. I picked the ‘sleeve’ as a middle ground - more effective and long-term than the band, but way less complications than the gastric bypass which reroutes your small intestine.</p>

<p>to abasket - I had always been a yo-yo dieter, where I could diet hard for about 2-3 months, then I would just give up, so I used that pre-op time for a reduced calorie diet and starting my exercise. At about the time I would normally have given up, I was getting ready for my surgery which enabled me to keep going and maintain. A lot of people who have these surgeries use those last free months and pig out. I decided to get a head start and was very glad I did. Plus the doctor wanted my liver ‘shrunk’ before doing the surgery. As you probably know, its 90% in your head and I was just in a good place then about getting this done for my long-term health. The one thing that helped the most was I made my own spreadsheet and logged every calorie. I planned on 2000 calories a day for 2 weeks, 1800 for 2, 1600 for 2, etc. But once I started logging and exercising, I was decreasing my calories a lot faster and ended up around 1200 a day. The 2 week liquid diet was 480 a day (3 Premier Protein drinks from Costco). By that time, I didn’t have any problem doing that, other than boredom and wanting to get through it.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>That’s actually quite interesting. However, it states that it is simply for spot reduction such as love handles or saddle bags, certainly not for systemic fat reduction like diet changes are designed to do. Sounds like it is most effective for relatively thin people who have a small area of fat resistant to diet and exercise, not for obese people who would qualify for bariatric surgery.</p>