<p>Perhaps a meta-level factor is that, from all accounts, Wesleyan has tended and still tends to attract and accept what some posters have called a “non-mainstream” type of student. Since most definitions of “mainstream” would likely include a “mainstream” career path, is it possible that Wesleyan’s relative lack of endowment is simply a reflection of the values and career paths of its alums? Surely, if Wesleyan had the endowment of an Amherst or Williams, professors would be paid more, window trim would be freshly painted on an annual basis, and leaf clutter swiftly cleared from walkways. No?</p>