What are some complicated pieces of literature?

<p>There’s no apostrophe in Finnegans Wake.</p>

<p>Scarlet Letter’s diction seemed pretty straight forward to me when I first read it, and I had just finished my 7th grade year.</p>

<p>Dante’s Divine Comedy is pretty tough. Imagine reading it without notes!</p>

<p>Anything by Joyce
Gravity’s Rainbow</p>

<p>Anything post-Prufrock from T.S. Eliot’s works.
Vladimir Nabokov’s Pale Fire - About a 1000-line poem whose author died after writing the 999th line, along with fictional commentary on the poem. The relationship between the author and commentator is very confusing.
Thomas Pynchon likes twisty plots and bizarre postmodern themes, as does David Foster Wallace.
Many of Faulkner’s books are considered quite complicated…</p>

<p>Then, of course, come philosophers.
Bertrand Russell is a clear writer, but the concepts in some of his works are somewhat mind-boggling. Lacan, Foucault, and Derrida are notoriously confusing postmodernists (in fact, Foucault attacked Derrida for this), and among other philosophers, Kant, Hegel, Carl Schmitt, Kierkegaard, and Leo Strauss wrote many confusing works.</p>

<p>Faulkner is usually good for people who want to completely confuse themselves :). Try “As I Lay Dying.” Lots of people hate it because it just seems so random and unorganized. The plot itself is ridiculous and even trivial. But what makes it interesting is the characters. They’re just really deep and it takes a lot of time and thinking, but if you really analyze the book, there’s a lot of stuff going on.</p>

<p>And 1984 has a strong message but I personally didn’t like it. I respect the fact that it’s deep, and Orwell is putting across an important point, but it just wasn’t my cup of tea.</p>

<p>Catch-22 is amazing. Everything is just SUPERB.</p>

<p>Ulysses and As I Lay Dying…mostly anything by James Joyce or Faulkner fits the bill.</p>

<p>I agree with “As I Lay Dying” and “Catch 22”</p>

<p>As I Lay Dying is one of Faulkner’s easier books. From what I hear, The Sound and the Fury or Absalom, Absalom are absolutely mind-boggling!</p>

<p>Lol, I’m studying for a Catch-22 test right now.</p>

<p>Catch-22 doesn’t use conventional time-line methods, and the prevalent lack of logic and circular reasoning in the characters’ conversations adds to the insanity.</p>

<p>I hear that A Clockwork Orange is pretty difficult to get through, but the story is definitely interesting! :D</p>

<p>I second Gravity’s Rainbow.</p>

<p>I haven’t read it personally, but my prof who went to Pomona said when he was there this guy gave a seminar to some college freshman and assigned that book and it owned them.</p>

<p>^^ A Clockwork Orange is also another amazing book, but it’s more complicated in the sense that it is written in complex slang language (known Nadsat) created by the author. It might be a little discouraging at first to grasp it, but otherwise, it’s a fantastic piece of literature.</p>

<p>I want to read A Clockwork Orange!</p>

<p>[This</a> book is probably the hardest read](<a href=“http://images.asia.ru/img/alibaba/photo/51339742/Pop_up_Book.jpg]This”>http://images.asia.ru/img/alibaba/photo/51339742/Pop_up_Book.jpg)</p>

<p>^ definitely.</p>

<p>Anna Karenina… such an amazing book…</p>

<p>Paradise Lost or anything by Marvell or Spenser</p>

<p>Ulysses, Crime and Punishment, East of Eden, Notes from Underground, The Wind Up Bird Chronicle, Pride and Prejudice, Brothers Karamazov, Father’s and Sons, 1984, Kafka on the Shore, Hard Times</p>

<p>And of course the unpublished Chiliad by Simon Otius at unhappened [dot] com.</p>