<p>Dorothy: I’m not surprised you liked those books (and not necessarily Love in the Time of Cholera, which turns out really to have been GGM’s magnum opus). You would probably like everything of Vargas Llosa’s – I often describe him as the best 19th Century novelist writing in the 20th Century. In some respects, it’s shocking that the author of that book came within a few inches of being elected President of his country, but there’s no question that there’s a gravitas in his work – even in his comic novels – and a concern with things that matter to people in the real world that is missing from lots of contemporary fiction.</p>
<p>Have you read The War of the End of the World? I think that’s really Vargas Llosa’s great political novel, beating out Conversation by a thinnish margin. It’s also perhaps his least characteristic novel, one of the few in which he or a close stand-in is not a principal character, and which takes place in a context with which he had no personal experience. I am quite saddened by the decline in Vargas Llosa’s skill in his last few books, but he had thirty years, from the mid-60s to the mid-90s, where he didn’t write anything that wasn’t absolutely worth reading. (I would say his last really good book was probably The Storyteller – which is something of a rewriting of Aunt Julia, see below – although In Praise of the Stepmother/Don Rigoberto’s Notebooks, his autobiography, and Lituma in the Andes all retain some interest in conjunction with his other books. After that, mostly not.)</p>
<p>The other book to read if you liked Conversation is Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter, which is something of a romantic comedy and meta-text about narrative. What’s cool about the Conversation/Aunt Julia pairing is that, if you are familiar with MVL’s biography, the events depicted in the two books were practically contemporaneous. They are both novels of college life, and the same life provides all of the details, but there is only a tiny overlap in which details he chose to use for each book, and so the stories wind up being radically different. </p>
<p>Conversation was the apogee of the first phase of MVL’s career, where he developed a difficult, modernist, and technically amazing writing style. (You must like that; there are few more difficult, modernist books than Christopher Unborn.) After that, he simplified his style radically, while doing many of the same things. So while Conversation is a dazzling fugue in which three conversations among different people at different times will be layered on top of one another, in Aunt Julia you generally go 20-30 pages at a time without shifting perspective or time. And yet (without giving anything away), all of the stylistic elements of Conversation are present, and commented upon, in Aunt Julia. </p>
<p>(I also think Aunt Julia is a commentary on 100 Years of Solitude, but that’s a different essay. MVL actually had a lot to do with the canonization of GGM, notwithstanding their vast political, national, social, and stylistic differences. Prior to 1969, MVL was by far the better known young Latin American author, much prized and granted, and with three critical and commercial successes under his belt. After 100 Years came out, MVL published a book-length study of GGM’s then-not-very-extensive life and oeuvre – an amazing act of homage to a contemporary and rival.)</p>
<p>And, if you liked Christopher Unborn, maybe you should try Fuentes’ Terra Nostra, which is similar and (for me) better, without being any easier to read.</p>
<p>Borges and Cortazar sort of got wrapped up in the Boom, but neither really belongs to it. Borges – whose stories I and everyone else love – was really of a completely different generation and outlook. Cortazar was only half a cohort away, but his literary project was really wrapped up with French surrealism: he wanted to grow up to be Celine or Cocteau. GGM, MVL, Fuentes, and others were looking at Faulkner and Flaubert.</p>