<p>As others have said, the LL is the gold standard of Ivy athletic admission. Without that, even a high AI kid is fighting it out in the regular pool of high-academic applicants. But there is an aspect of the LL that I think we tend to overlook. From the school’s perspective, the LL is a tool to allow them to compete for athletes against other schools that can give a decision much earlier than the Ivies can. In other words, Ivy League schools use the LL to take a recruit off the market. But in the absence of any recruiting interest from a competing school, the school doesn’t have much incentive to give that early indication of admission and issue the LL.</p>
<p>I had an email exchange with a parent who told me, " …the coach told (student) that absent information that
(student) was being recruited by another school that (ivy school) considered competitive, admissions might not be inclined to issue the LL. "
At first, I thought this might just be a case of a coach backing away from a recruit and blaming admissions, but the recruit in question was able to show competing interest from another school and has since received a LL.</p>
<p>So in OP’s case - could an athlete get “full support” without being issued a LL if there was no recruiting interest from a competitive school? In theory, I think that’s possible - but it’s probably a moot point since most athletes at the top of the game athletically and academically will have recruiting interest from several competing schools.</p>