<p>
</p>
<p>Williams, Swarthmore and several others are known for grade deflation. The curve is steep, and even if everyone in the class deserves an A, everyone doesn’t receive an A. If your objective is to maintain an A average, then you will be exceedingly stressed.</p>
<p>On the other hand, it’s not so hard to get a B (or B- in a very tough course or B+ without trying too hard). I would think that a range of A’s and B’s is the norm. I can only speak for Williams, but for sure kids balance academics with ECs (sports, arts, activism - sometimes more than one) and pure socializing. </p>
<p>Another point that I would make about small LACs is that the professors know their students and if the students are under-performing or slacking, the professors often take the initiative to find out why and get them back on track. </p>
<p>There are other safety nets available, like reading centers, study groups and professor-led review sessions, but, to me, the personal involvement of the instructors is the key factor that keeps less focused students from crashing and burning even in the most rigorous academic environments. This is not strictly hand-holding as the criteria are still very tough; it is more of an awareness of their students’ individual capabilities and the personal connection that mentors and motivates.</p>
<p>Look at the graduation rates at the most selective LACs; they are incredibly high, which indicates that once they get them in the fold, the schools find a way to help students succeed. Then look at the graduate and professional school acceptance rates for the same schools. This indicates that even if they’re not getting all A’s, these kids are getting into top programs.</p>