<p>The question is: Does tax-law Prof. Martin J. McMahon has a an <em>Entitlement</em> to PRIVATE meals?</p>
<p>Edit: To the moderators: This thread is relevant to financial aid because it relates to the issue of whether private colleges and universities can do whatever they want with their money without scrutiny from other citizens.</p>
<p>I think the IRS would have to charge all employees that get free coffee, yearly t-shirts, pizza at meetings, and breakfast pasteries at some of the most basic places of employment. </p>
<p>I am not sure how his tax money is supporting free meals at google either.</p>
<p>Google is not the only place that does this. UBS used to have a cafeteria where all could eat so eat, as did a number of other places. I know some private schools where lunch is free for all who happen to be there while it’s being served. The same with work place coffee and such that Vlines mentions. Google just happens to do theirs up first class.</p>
<p>I guess those Admissions Counselors at colleges would have to be taxed on all those spreads that the college puts out for visitors and such too.</p>
<p>Well, I know my kid has to pay income taxes on his grant aid from the college that goes toward room and board. All students who receive aid beyond “qualified educational expenses” (tuition, fees, books) have to pay taxes on the money. So Google is way behind colleges on this issue.</p>
<p>Google’s objective is to keep employees at the office working longer and interacting more. It’s good business and I wish more companies did this.</p>
<p>A lot of companies do this not just Google. Bloomberg does this too. There are companies who give free chocolates, sell discounted infant formula, cosmetics, etc. to employees.</p>
<p>I’m no tax expert, but I was under the impression that if an employer provided a benefit to only some employees, it was taxable and if was for all, it wasn’t. Are the meals free or inexpensive? The important point is they sound delicious. Many companies have cafeterias that are very reasonably priced and I would assume they are operating at or below cost, not as a profit center. The same could be said for company based gyms. In your example it seems to me it is Google deciding their employees are entitled to a first class lunch, not the employees themselves.</p>