<p>
</p>
<p>Which is why, as I said, I disagree with “ObamaCare.” Public option should be the way to go, not a mandate to purchase private insurance.</p>
<p>But you asserted that the bill would have an “enormous” future cost - a statement for which you have not the slightest shred of evidence, and which, in fact, is refuted by independent analysis.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Because that sentence is completely false?</p>
<p>What, you think that if you throw enough baloney against the wall, I don’t get to pick and choose which bit of nonsense to attack first?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Thus you admit to the evidence-free, logically-bankrupt nature of your argument.</p>