<p>I don’t mean to shock any regular readers of this forum, but I think complaints about delayed and missing notifications of scholarship status are completely valid. Organizing a mailing to 1,000 or so recipients of good scholarship news, and the less fortunate other 26,000 applicants should not be so difficult, I agree. The system needs a fix. But whether or not your student got a “so sorry” letter (which of course she/he deserved to receive) or it is still missing due to mailing/processing mishandling, their chances at admissions in the regular cycle are unaltered. The mailing of that letter has nothing at all to do with admissions decisions. I can understand the anger at waiting and wondering and frustration at deducing (!) your student is not invited to scholarship interviews, but USC offers admissions to about 7500 more applicants in March and such amazing kids as ComputerDad’s and so many who post their stellar stats here have excellent chances to be among that group–as they do in all highly selective universities. I’m not sure why some seem to equate the decision on Trustee/Presidential interviews with all hope of admissions? To put it perspective, out of 100 students who apply by the deadline, fewer than 4 students get good $$ news. 1 will be interviewed (no guarantee, however) for Trustee. 2.3 will interview for Presidential, and .7 (what would .7 of a teenager look like?) will receive Deans. I imagine that out of the 96 cool and brilliant kids who are not in that lucky group, MANY are equally gifted. </p>
<p>I personally object strongly to posters who, in defending USC’s (or any institution) right to select their scholarship candidates, inaccurately suggest that USC has selected the top 3.7% for interviews. The kids are wonderful, but they are also the lucky ones. They are AMONG the top students applying this year, but by no means represent some definitive quantifiable “top.” If anything, perhaps they meet–in this admissions cycle, out of this pool of applicants–some specific needs of the various Schools and majors to which they apply. This is not a qualitative distinction–just the difference in flavors that make up the applicant pool. </p>
<p>So many of our wonderful kids know how important top scholarships can be to our finances and missing this invitation is harsh. The gnashing of teeth from middle and upper middle income parents is truly understandable. It’s hard not to feel badly that it doesn’t go one’s way. </p>
<p>In answer, USC offers 1/2 Presidential scholarships to their admitted NMFs and that does make a huge difference. If any of you have kids in this group, please do not give up hope. It’s only about 6 more weeks and all will be revealed. If you do not have NMFs (I don’t), there may be other smaller merit scholarships available. And I would encourage everyone to visit the FinAid website to run the FinAid calculator. If you have more than one student in college it makes a huge difference. A family who has an EFC of $50,000 (practically full pay for one student) is expected to pay that same amount for 2 or even 3 students in college at the same time. USC offers a significant amount of aid in grants. It’s worth checking out.</p>
<p>Lastly, I really want to apologize if my long posts seem to be apologies for USC. I am simply beyond grateful my sons have been part of the lucky ones. I do not think it is more than that–although of course my boys are excellent!! (heh) But they are very lucky too. Many wonderful universities that my have high ranking but are not quite as wonderful as USC (my bias now showing!) do not offer ANY significant merit awards. </p>
<p>My goodness, are you still reading this way too long post!!! :)</p>