<p>But the moral obligation arises from anti-racism policies set in an institution, which could promote reverse racism such as it is happening in South Africa after the end of Apartheid (e.g. the sign-language translator at the Mandela funeral). I think that Fraternity organizations have the right to be separated by race to a certain point because in essence it is a brotherhood, so the people chosen are those that the current members feel will fit in the best. There is a racism problem that occurs on campuses, but I dont think Greek Organization are responsible and if they are it should be the university cracking down on racist parties (Compton Party made the news same with a another one about ‘thots’". The university should be instituting policies that promote equality without forcing a quota. So realistically banning Greek Orgs. would be more helpful to promote “diversity” and “equality” in a campus than encouraging Greek Orgs. to accept more minorities.</p>
<p>It can be argued that Affirmative Action does more harm than good in the current day and age, and many institutions might feel pressured to accept URM’s due to a threat of being sued by the NAACP or similar organization. Instead the focus of AA should be for the lower income ranges to give them the opportunity at gaining the “connections” necessary to enter several high paying professions in the U.S.A.</p>