<p>
</p>
<p>1) You offer no evidence to corroborate this claim.
2) This “minor exception” would seem to contradict your original claim. This only further proves my point in that you cannot adequately conflate the libertarian ideology and assign it to some arbitrary point on a political spectrum. Such an act would be akin to a hasty generalization, which is a logical fallacy.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I am no such thing; however, I have submitted an article for publishing that conveys an accurate depiction of the libertarian ideology at its core. It is much more accurate than your summation, that much is certain.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Primarily because the purpose of this forum is to discuss “Rice University,” and not engage in political debates; I am also in the process of writing a paper on Kantian metaphysics, and this discussion has a high potential for distracting me at my task. However, if you are really passionate about this dispute, I suggest that you, first (1), learn the logical fallacies, and (2) read a piece on the Libertarian* ideology or send me a private message so we can engage in this discussion without detracting from the purpose of this forum.</p>
<p>*There is a distinction between Libertarians and libertarians. The former advocates a minimalist state while the latter endorses anarchy. </p>
<p>Good Day:)</p>
<p>Edited for rhetorical accuracy.</p>