@njsue:
I tend to agree, a lot of people have forgotten “there but the grace of God go I” when looking at the misfortunes of others, and part of that is the whole resurgance of Ayn Rand’s mythos of heroic builders who did it all themselves and so forth and it leaves out quite frankly the elements that allowed them to achieve, it is a big ego boost to say “I owe no one nothing, I did it all myself”. That doesn’t mean success is nothing more than luck or randomness, it isn’t, success and doing things requires a lot of things. Being entrepeneurial requires taking risks, for example, and if you profile those who go that route, they came from backgrounds where risk taking was not discouraged (as compared to, say, the parents who want their kids never to take risks, never go outside their comfort zone, because if you fail, after all, it is disaster). MItt Romney built a big business, and whatever I think of Bain, he built it, but he also came from a background where his dad had a huge network of friends and acquaintainces, and where he grew up surrounded by people in business, and that made a big difference. The guy who founded the company I work for (since bought), when I asked him told him his father always encouraged him to try things, and his dad was entrepeneurial. It didn’t hurt that the guy was bloody brilliant, graduated with a 4.0 from MIT without doing much studying in chem engineering, but he acknowledged the debt of having his father.
@MiamiDAP :
No one was saying that it was luck alone, and I am getting tired of the Ayn Rand crowd using that as a retort when anyone brings up the things that lead to success, basically ridiculing the notion that luck plays any role in people’s success and claiming that people are saying it is all luck, which it is not. Claiming that you might as well play lotto to hope for success is just as wrong as those who claim they ‘did it themselves’, the John Gault myth of the self made man who achieved and therefore owes no one anything, both are equally self serving to either someone who is generally making excuses for their own lack of success (the “it is all luck”) or the self heroic view of things (I did it myself, no one gave me anything"). If you are a successful woman in today’s world, you owe more than a bit of that to luck of having followed generations of people battling the bigotry and stupidity of religion and society that limited women to baby making machines. It is part of the mindset of the old “anyone can achieve anything, if they try hard enough”, or worse, “If I can make it, so can they” totally dismissing the luck that that person might have had in being allowed to achieve (note the word allowed, the person still had to achieve). I am what I think is pretty successful in life, and I worked hard to achieve it, I didn’t have a rich daddy with well off buddies, I didn’t go to an Ivy league school and have the old boy network, but I had an upbringing where i lived in a safe area where I didn’t have to fear getting shot to death walking home from school, I went to schools that were decent, if not spectacular, I had two educated parents who not only expected me to learn, but pushed learning for the sake of learning, the love of reading and understanding things, I have some what I believe are inherited abilities, and I also learned from my dad, both caught and taught, about how you live your life…someone else who didn’t have that, even if they had by inate skills, might have ended up very differently. The idea of same outcome from different starts is basically an excuse from those who have achieved to deny the fact that they had , for want of a better term, luck of the draw, that allowed them to achieve, rather than realizing that not everyone was so fortunate or lucky.
My dad once was confronted with an Ayn Rand type like that, who proclaimed how achievement was about the character of the person, how those who don’t make it simply lacked “the will” (growing up during the Depression, that alone made my father see red). My dad told the story about a friend of his growing up, his family was poor, the kid grew up to be a very successful lawyer in NYC, partner in one of the top law firms. The Ayn Rand type would nod, and say “see, if he could do it, anyone can”…then my dad hit the guy with the Sunday punch, that the friend later on acknowledged that he was helped by a public school system that during the 1930’s, was the envy of the world, and he had teachers and mentors who saw his promise and helped. The kid was Jewish, and back then there was a real community around that and there were succesful members of their temple who made sure to try and help the kids in the community achieve. The kid in winter used to go into the lobbies of hotels to do his homework, because his family apartment was always very cold, and no one bothered him. The kid had access to CCNY which at the time was world class, and literally was tuition free, and he was able to afford textbooks because members of his temple would either pay for them or sometimes older kids would have the books already…and someone at an Ivy league law school took a chance on him, even though he was coming out of ‘only’ CCNY, at a time when Jews were rarely given that privilege, so someone saw something in him. After he graduated, a partner at a major law firm took an interest in him and again was willing to take a chance on hiring a Jewish kid, at a time when many big law firms openly discriminated against Jews. My father’s friend turned out to be a really top notch lawyer, and he was successful because he was talented out it, no doubt, but a lot of things allowed him to succeed when so much was against him…and it likely could have worked very differently if for example, he was poor, lived in a rural area where there were crappy schools, where there wasn’t a community to support him, what would have happened to him?