<p>Okay. I am sorry if it were a little too subtle. I talked about two mutually exclusive cases and they were: 1. some fraction of the EAs don’t have a choice because they make Chicago their “Mr. Right Now”, as JHS put it. So their yield is therefore likely higher than RDs and therefore it wasn’t a fair comparison when EA’s yield is included and be compared to another school’s RD yield. 2. all EAs do have a choice of different schools to select from (case 1 doesn’t hold), that would just mean fewer people (as compared to case 1) make Chicago their Mr. Right Now. So that weakens, not strengthen, the argument that Chicago is more popular. Note that the two cases are mutually exclusive but both weakens the conclusion.</p>
<p>Note that my #2 is NOT a subset of #1. This is way different from what you thought.</p>