<p>RML: That Stanford has more resources and is richer is a fact. Most likely it is more “prestigious” as a university, in this country and abroad. I don’t agree with the comment about better students. You’d have to define that a little better to convince me. Chicago undergraduates have objectively measurable qualifications which are as good as if not better than Stanford’s undergraduates.</p>
<p>Kalorama, with all due respect the comment about UChicago physical sciences is absurd.</p>