<p>that ARobot’s grievance has now been boiled down to a repeated nonsensical question about whether Williams faculty should have to follow all local, state, and federal laws. Yes, they must follow all such laws, and of course they must do so regardless of whether Williams says they have to. Guess what: Williams does not some magical power to absolve faculty of illegal conduct. If you believe that Williams or its faculty has acted in some sort of illegal fashion, I suggest you report that purportedly illegal conduct to state or local authorities, who, not Williams, have the power to investigate violations of law. Beyond that, I doubt you are an expert in labor or employment law, which I’m sure is the foundation of whatever policies Williams has in place regarding its employees, including its faculty members. </p>
<p>As it stands, though, beyond that, no one can answer your apparently rhetorical question without any context whatsoever regarding what you are talking about. When you are prepared to actually offer some level of detail, then you have a right to expect people to engage with you. It’s impossible to rebut vague, unsubstantiated, impossible-to-understand allegations without some sort of factual context. If you can’t provide that, then don’t expect anyone to take your claims seriously. Otherwise, this is a useless and exercise and you come off sounding like someone with a big grudge who was in no way treated improperly but wants to cast serious, anonymous allegations of unlawful contact, without any information whatsoever to back that up. Doesn’t exactly make it seem like whatever happened to you was in any way unjustified, since you aren’t even providing anyone an opportunity to respond in any serious way.</p>