GUEST STUDENT OF THE WEEK: Rohan is a freshman at Dartmouth (and loves it) having gotten in ED for the Class of 2023. He's here to debunk myths regarding admissions and student life at his school. ASK HIM ANYTHING!
Make sure to check out our May Checklists for HS Juniors and HS Seniors. Consult these quick resources to get you started on the process this month.
As we work to adjust to the current reality, make sure to check out these dedicated COVID-19 resources: our directory of virtual campus tours, our directory of extended deadlines, as well as the list of schools going test optional this fall.
Racist comments from a male senior, what should we do?
This discussion has been closed.
Replies to: Racist comments from a male senior, what should we do?
The teacher knew my child was Chinese (I'm not Chinese) and was definitely making a remark that if only I had books about China my child would be reading. This teacher did not like my daughter, and didn't like the other minority kids in the class either, even the girl who was the top student in the class. It was pretty obvious to all. A year after my kids had her, she was forced to retire by other parents who had had enough (private school where some parents, not me, had a lot of power).
While it may be unfair, minority students do have to learn to deal with a lot of comments on their own. My daughter couldn't possibly have reported every incident to school authorities and expected a smooth ride through high school. When she was younger, we actually worked on how to respond to comments. She could walk away, she could confront the individual (such as suggested above "I can't believe you said that"), she could choose not to interact with the person again. If physical or threatening, she could (and should) report it. She couldn't be battling every single thing another person said to her. Even within our family things were (and still are) said that are racist and not nice (my father is more like Archie Bunker than anyone cares to admit), or are sometimes just teasing. When she was very young and my brothers were teasing, I'd let it go until I felt she'd had enough and stop it. Each interaction she became a little stronger, a little less likely to take the teasing as a personal attack. They teased my other daughter too, and nothing would have hurt my Chinese daughter more than to not be treated as an equal to her sister and cousins. She had NO sense of humor (she was not an infant at adoption) and had to work on it or her life would have been miserable. Now she has a pretty good sense of what she must ignore and when she should speak up, and an even better sense of when she should just walk away. It is a rare comment that she reports to authorities.
Gender should not be an excuse for discriminatory comments. Unfortunately, grown men also make these types of comments. "Boys will be boys" is another trope that has gone on far too long.
That's an interesting take on things. So are you saying that you think bullying only occurs when physical intimidation is involved? Because otherwise all insults, name calling, etc. can be classified as "opinion".
Now I am not saying one ill-advised comment makes something "bullying", but still you might want to rethink the statement above, or at least clarify a bit.
I really think your problem is your high school. They should have dealt with this better. That said, your daughter is a senior and this is NOT her friend. She should be told explicitly that people who express hateful, racist comments are not your friend even if you're not the target of the comment that day.
1. That mainly applies to government attempts to suppress speech....especially political speech by private citizens, entities, etc. It doesn't apply to private individuals, institutions, or even employers...including public sector employers in employment or certain academic situations*.
2. Even some of the founding fathers did not necessarily agree with the idea of "laughing off/ignoring" insults. In fact, a one doing so....especially if one was part of the upper/upper-middle classes back in their time period would have been considered tantamount to admitting the insulter was correct and being socially ostracized accordingly as well as for "cowardice" for not demanding satisfaction from the insulter in the form of a duel which could end with one or both duelists greviously injured or even killed outright.
This was the reason why insults...even ones we'd consider innocuous in our day usually prompted challenges to a dual to the insulter by the insulted....and sometimes men...including well-educated pillars of the community like Alexander Hamilton found themselves compelled by prevailing social convention to participating in duals...and in his case...dying from it.
* Providing a safe secure educational environment for all students...including those from marginalized groups.
It's amazing to me how some people see racial and ethnic insults and slurs as just shrug worthy when they can cause lasting damage. Some time ago I attended a workshop for families that are biracial by marriage, birth, adoption, etc. (See the MAVIN Foundation). An entire group of young women adopted from Asian countries talked about the pain of not being protected by their own parents as relatives "joked" with them about their ethnicity. None of them were close to their parents as a result. I would and I have stood up to my own siblings and their kids when they've "joked" with my D about her race. She has never felt that I don't have her back, but she also knows how to stand up for herself. The two are not mutually exclusive.
In WW2, a small number of people of German and Italian ancestry were interned; almost all were not US citizens, and their cases were considered individually (based on activities indicating potential national security risk, not just ethnic ancestry or nationality of an enemy nation), although there were some due process questions. Note that this was done to a small number persons of Japanese ancestry as well, before Executive Order 9066 forced all persons of Japanese ancestry to leave the western mainland or move to relocation camps.
Yes, this means that Executive Order 9066 was useless, wasteful, and counterproductive, since those actually believed to be national security risks as individuals were already being detained or kept under watch.
So German-Americans and Italian-Americans were detained on an individual basis based on lack of citizenship status/perceived national security risk.
Japanese-Americans were forced to relocate/detained in camps wholesale, because of their ethnicity. I am sure it was unconstitutional at the time.
It's easier if you can tell a person is "other" just by looking at them, right? Try doing that with persons of German ancestry in the US.
Do you think he might have made the same comment if the OPs daughter, who was born to a US American father and a Chinese mother in Hong Kong, had been born to a US-American father and an ethnically English or Irish mother inLondon or Dublin?
If your d and h really wanted to teach him a lesson, then how about notifying the committee/people that selects the valedictorian? If the administration knows what he's like, then why would they want to pick this boy? And after notifying them of yet another transgression, wouldn't this knock him out of the running?
P.S. This guys has very little friends and my daughter probably is his only female friend. So I doubt he would have too much opportunity to offend people. He does it in social science class but you get to voice your own opinion, don't you?"
Pomona class of 2020: acceptance rate at a record low of 9.1 percent.
Ten applicants for every place and this was the best they could do?
Yes (also some of Japanese ancestry as well, on an individual basis, before Executive Order 9066).
Yes, by Executive Order 9066, if they were unable to move out of the western mainland on short notice.
In 1944, the US Supreme Court sided 6-3 with the government in ruling that the exclusion of persons of Japanese ancestry from the western mainland in Executive Order 9066 was constitutional in Fred Korematsu versus United States.
It was also easier to indulge in a taste of racism when the targeted group was small enough that the disruption to society and economy was relatively small to others (unlike if an exclusion order were written for persons of German or Italian ancestry generally in the US, or persons of Japanese ancestry in Hawaii).
The issue is the statement the kid made went well-beyond merely making a political statement.
Once he personalized it towards OP's D by saying SHE should be deported, that crosses the line from making a political statement into making a personal racist attack which would be a violation of many high school conduct codes regarding racist behavior, harassment, etc.
If he had merely said all illegal immigrants should be deported, THAT would have been a political statement.
Recent Supreme Court rulings have found that while students have First Amendment rights, it is more limited than the general public at large as the public schools have a compelling interest in enacting limits in the interest of fulfilling their mission of providing a safe secure environment conducive and that "consciously or otherwise, teachers—and indeed the older students—demonstrate the appropriate form of civil discourse and political expression by their conduct and deportment in and out of class":
Bethel School District v. Fraser
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
Morse v. Frederick
That's not to say I necessarily agree 100% with the rulings in these three cases. However, these cases do demonstrate how courts have felt the need to allow for school districts to balance their students First Amendment rights with their compelling need to provide a safe secure educational environment and education for K-12 students.
Kids tell half truths all the time to skew an incident in their favor. Drop it and move on. AND NO that does not mean I am teaching my children to accept racism as someone accused earlier.