carachel22952 replies23 discussionsRegistered UserPosts: 2,975Senior Member
D loved the U Pitt Campus but it is urban and doesn't fit the picturesque campus a lot of people have in their minds when they think of college.
Miami U (Ohio) was definitely gorgeous--green and pretty buildings. I liked the campus itself a LOT but D said it creeped her out because all the buildings looked the same and they all looked so perfect.
There's gorgeous architecture at Pitt for an urban campus. Here is an online tour from a sports website (starts with sports facilities, but then moves to campus and surrounding area):
Yes Pepperdine and Stanford should be on the list. It appears the vast majority of these schools are east of the Mississippi. Traditional architecture is certainly main criteria. Most of those schools all look alike.
Central part of the UVa grounds, designed by Thomas Jefferson.
---
Some colleges are mainly beautiful because of their architecture. However, some people get obsessed with uniformity of architecture, which is not always good. Many other campuses are well know for a beautiful setting (such as lakes and mountains or ocean views), but their individual buildings are nothing special. Other campuses are mainly known for their great canopy of mature trees.
maya542053 replies87 discussionsRegistered UserPosts: 2,140Senior Member
I don't think any university has anything to compare classroom wise to those special rooms in Pitts Tower of Learning. Really amazing.
Also the video posted above confirms my memory that we didn't find UVA to be all that pretty. It seemed barren and muddy. To each his own as the poster above said.
wis7513893 replies62 discussionsRegistered UserPosts: 13,955Senior Member
Beauty is definitely in the eye of the beholder. I do not recognize the UW-Madison building in that second link- there are several much more iconic buildings on campus. Plus an overview of the views from some hills of buildings and the lake make the campus, not some reviewers view of an obscure building.
Those lists are horrendous. One building does not make a beautiful campus, it is the entire campus. Plus, some of us think most of those iconic buildings are ugly, could be anywhere, etc. Old architecture- so many of the buildings are interchangeable. So many flat, boring campuses make the list. I see very little architecture that fits the surroundings. I also see many depressing buildings that were built to impress but not my style.
They need to look at overall campuses, not have a most beautiful building to make the list. When you look at the photos they are just a bunch of period architecture that is usually fairly boring or ugly.
It's interesting how they chose rural campuses- they are more likely to have more beauty due to the proximity of nature. There are some more urban campuses that are more beautiful- sometimes an oasis in the midst of a city, or like UW, an oasis in a city lucky to have good natural topography.
Just goes to show how subjective things are. Kudos to those who go for the people part of a campus, not external appearances. Most of those old buildings lack the creature comforts that make for a more pleasant experience- think heating and air conditioning for one.
LivinProof64 replies0 discussionsRegistered UserPosts: 64Junior Member
The most beautiful we visited was Boston College, but DD ended up on a stunning campus at UC Berkeley (adjective does not apply when leaving campus to the south). The bay views are glorious.
twoinanddone22124 replies14 discussionsRegistered UserPosts: 22,138Senior Member
I think one building does make the USAFA beautiful - the chapel building (although it is much more than a chapel). It is modern like the Air Force, spiky like the mountains, and sets off all the flat buildings of the campus.
U of Colorado is not known for its old buildings but for all the modern ones built of the same stone and roofs. My daughter really likes it because it is uniform. She liked the USAFA. She wasn't crazy about Florida Southern because some of the buildings are Frank Lloyd Wright and some are old southern buildings with columns. Messy.
Here are the top ones based (of the ones I've seen) based on how I feel today and not necessarily in rank order (but generally in rank order):
Larger (to midsize) schools: Cambridge (UK), Oxford (UK), Princeton, Yale, William and Mary, Colorado, West Point, Indiana University, Chicago, Berkeley, Stanford, UVA, Dartmouth, Duke.
Smaller schools: Richmond, Swarthmore, Washington and Lee, Sewanee, Vassar, Kenyon, Mount Holyoke, Sweet Briar, Colgate, Union, Bryn Mawr (I haven't seen some that get noted such as Bucknell, Furman, etc.)
I like to visit campuses, but it is difficult to evaluate them when the weather, time of year, and time elapsed since the visit may play a factor. I broke it into larger and smaller schools since it is tough to compare them. Larger schools often some more impressive buildings and spaces, but sometimes have areas that are not nearly as nice (e.g. medical centers, etc.)
AGoodFloridian1353 replies19 discussionsRegistered UserPosts: 1,372Senior Member
edited December 2016
@IzzoOne , that list is great!
Kenyon, Swarthmore, Darthmouth and UVa have some of the most gorgeous campuses I've ever seen, but one university hasn't been mentioned..
Where's the love for Vanderbilt, guys? ;;) The campus, the area, the students. They're all just too damn good looking, how is this so?!
turbo932828 replies30 discussionsRegistered UserPosts: 2,858Senior Member
edited December 2016
My former cubemate is a West Point graduate and reports that looks can be deceiving . Chicago... well, eventually the Gothic architecture kind of gets to your nerves a bit. Thankfully there are a few modern buildings to break the monotony. Indiana... DD2 is there. Amazing landscaping and 'unity' of theme. Same comment as for Chicago, a bit too uniform especially if you're trying to find your way around? Stanford is awesome especially landscaping as well.
Replies to: On a more pleasant note: A most beautiful college campus list
Miami U (Ohio) was definitely gorgeous--green and pretty buildings. I liked the campus itself a LOT but D said it creeped her out because all the buildings looked the same and they all looked so perfect.
To each his own!
http://csnbbs.com/thread-564078.html
Central part of the UVa grounds, designed by Thomas Jefferson.
---
Some colleges are mainly beautiful because of their architecture. However, some people get obsessed with uniformity of architecture, which is not always good. Many other campuses are well know for a beautiful setting (such as lakes and mountains or ocean views), but their individual buildings are nothing special. Other campuses are mainly known for their great canopy of mature trees.
Also the video posted above confirms my memory that we didn't find UVA to be all that pretty. It seemed barren and muddy. To each his own as the poster above said.
Those lists are horrendous. One building does not make a beautiful campus, it is the entire campus. Plus, some of us think most of those iconic buildings are ugly, could be anywhere, etc. Old architecture- so many of the buildings are interchangeable. So many flat, boring campuses make the list. I see very little architecture that fits the surroundings. I also see many depressing buildings that were built to impress but not my style.
They need to look at overall campuses, not have a most beautiful building to make the list. When you look at the photos they are just a bunch of period architecture that is usually fairly boring or ugly.
It's interesting how they chose rural campuses- they are more likely to have more beauty due to the proximity of nature. There are some more urban campuses that are more beautiful- sometimes an oasis in the midst of a city, or like UW, an oasis in a city lucky to have good natural topography.
Just goes to show how subjective things are. Kudos to those who go for the people part of a campus, not external appearances. Most of those old buildings lack the creature comforts that make for a more pleasant experience- think heating and air conditioning for one.
http://engberganderson.com/project/hiram-smith-hall/
U of Colorado is not known for its old buildings but for all the modern ones built of the same stone and roofs. My daughter really likes it because it is uniform. She liked the USAFA. She wasn't crazy about Florida Southern because some of the buildings are Frank Lloyd Wright and some are old southern buildings with columns. Messy.
Larger (to midsize) schools: Cambridge (UK), Oxford (UK), Princeton, Yale, William and Mary, Colorado, West Point, Indiana University, Chicago, Berkeley, Stanford, UVA, Dartmouth, Duke.
Smaller schools: Richmond, Swarthmore, Washington and Lee, Sewanee, Vassar, Kenyon, Mount Holyoke, Sweet Briar, Colgate, Union, Bryn Mawr (I haven't seen some that get noted such as Bucknell, Furman, etc.)
I like to visit campuses, but it is difficult to evaluate them when the weather, time of year, and time elapsed since the visit may play a factor. I broke it into larger and smaller schools since it is tough to compare them. Larger schools often some more impressive buildings and spaces, but sometimes have areas that are not nearly as nice (e.g. medical centers, etc.)
Kenyon, Swarthmore, Darthmouth and UVa have some of the most gorgeous campuses I've ever seen, but one university hasn't been mentioned..
Where's the love for Vanderbilt, guys? ;;) The campus, the area, the students. They're all just too damn good looking, how is this so?!