<p>LD who for example are slow readers or “slow processors” by nearly all accounts either receive and extra 1.5 hours or “unlimited time” (whatever that means, maybe until the sun sets?) . However this 50% number in reference to the number of non-standard test takers for Greenwich does seem very high and makes one wonder how Ivy League schools could even consider a test result from that district as valid</p>
<p>Ask yourself this: the non-LD students UNDER NORMAL TESTING TIME GUIDELINES - who are Greenwich students - how would they be judged? A college wouldn’t be able to segregate who did what in what time.</p>
<p>If true -it would in fact be a scandal, and I cannot understand how the number could be this high</p>
<p>By some definitions, nearly every person on the planet might have some “learing disability” The SAT exam will soon become meaningless if these clear abuses continue</p>
<p>Now we have companies which offer “Psychoeducational evaluations.” Check out this “resource” and you will see how much potential abuse is likely going on here
<a href=“http://www.edufax.com/faqld.html[/url]”>http://www.edufax.com/faqld.html</a></p>