????

<p>when the (finalists in) the essay contest receive (their) scholarships (at) the awards ceremony , the first-place winner (was also given) a computer the answer is (was also given) i choose e</p>

<p>also</p>

<p>if the proposals (approved by) the city council (at its) most recent meeting (come to fruition), several derelict buildings will see new life after years of (neglect). why its not neglectance?</p>

<p>for #1, D “was also given” is the error because it has to match tense with “receive”</p>

<p>And why would you title this ??? !!!</p>

<p>i didnt think of a good subject.</p>

<p>thank you very much!</p>

<p>Years of neglect is an idiom </p>

<p>It is error ID, so youre trying to spot grammatical errors, not see what could improve the sentence</p>

<p>thx!</p>

<p>During the Elizebthan era, both men and women were prohibited (to wear) clothing considered extravagent for thier social rank to the time.</p>

<p>Is the error (to wear) or No Error?</p>

<p>i think its no error
what’s the answer?</p>

<p>it’s to wear, the corrsvr idiom is prohibited (from gerund)</p>

<p>Anyone else?</p>

<p>“Prohibited from” + gerund is the correct idiom. Post #8 nailed it. That’s probably why no one else answered.</p>