1900 and 26 - Which should i pursue?

Test Preparation
1

<p>On my recent SAT practice test I got a 1900 (55CR, 66M, 69WR) and a 26 on my official ACT (28E, 29M, 27R, 21S). I don’t know which test I should pursue as far as “hard core” studying goes. I’ve done some review for the SAT before the practice test but didn’t do any practice before my official ACT (although I was familiar with the format). I was actually surprised of my ACT score because I was so certain I had attained at least a 31 in both english and reading because they seemed so easy for me. I really like the SAT because it gives you so much time but the ACT questions are so much easier. I honestly have no idea what to do and need all of your advice to help me.</p>

<p>Also, does Silverturtle’s grammar guide help for the ACT? I noticed that the ACT is very “punctuation-based” which isn’t really tested on the SAT.</p>

<p>Thanks guys!</p>

2

<p>

</p>

<p>Yes, it should help. I included a little bit of punctuation stuff with the ACT in mind.</p>

3

<p>Please, can anyone help me make a decision?</p>

4

<p>[SAT-ACT</a> Conversion chart](<a href=“http://teachers.sduhsd.k12.ca.us/tpcounseling/Web_Pages/SAT-ACT_Conversion_Chart.htm]SAT-ACT”>http://teachers.sduhsd.k12.ca.us/tpcounseling/Web_Pages/SAT-ACT_Conversion_Chart.htm)</p>

<p>A 26 corresponds to approximately a 1760. A 1900 is in theory better, and many here would say (with dubious credibility, but I’ll represent their point of view anyway) that the SAT is taken more seriously. So I don’t see any reason to not go for the SAT if those are actually accurate predictors.</p>