<p>For the SAT-R (1970):
CR-580
M-720
W-670</p>
<p>ACT (29):
English - 30
Math - 28
Reading - 27
Science - 29
Optional Writing - 28</p>
<p>And my SAT Subject tests were:
Math IIC - 710
Chemistry - 650</p>
<p>What do you guys think?</p>
<p>For the SAT-R (1970):
CR-580
M-720
W-670</p>
<p>ACT (29):
English - 30
Math - 28
Reading - 27
Science - 29
Optional Writing - 28</p>
<p>And my SAT Subject tests were:
Math IIC - 710
Chemistry - 650</p>
<p>What do you guys think?</p>
<p>The SAT score is a little better, but they are close enough that you should send both.</p>
<p>honestly i’d retake the ACT (without writing) if you could. you might be able to squeak out a 30 or 31… it just depends on the test.</p>
<p>I guess it wouldn’t hurt to send in both, and yeah I plan on retaking it once more my senior year.</p>
<p>bump!!!</p>
<p>I’m going to be applying to UCs and out of state schools, and I heard that for some universities I could send in either SAT-R and ACT, OR SAT-R and SAT II’s. In my circumstances, would it be best to send in all of my test scores? And is my SAT-R really better than my ACT?? I thought a 29 is equivalent to like a 1980-2040. plzz help bump</p>
<p>Send everything in, because there is a marginal difference in ACT and SAT.</p>
<p>[ACT</a> Conversion chart](<a href=“http://www.pacificathleticalliance.com/ACTConversionchart.htm]ACT”>http://www.pacificathleticalliance.com/ACTConversionchart.htm)</p>
<p>29 ACT = 1920 SAT</p>
<p>Also I would send those SAT II’s in, they are definitely respectable.</p>
<p>If they are both that close, I would just send one!</p>