2006--The Year of the Black Republican?

<p>This is a very interesting article on Ken Blackwell, running for governor in Ohio. Right next door, former Steeler great Lynn Swann is poised to capture the Republican nomination to run against Ed Rendell for governor of PA. Current Maryland Lt. Governor Michael Steele is looking good in his run for the US Senate. A trend? Maybe, and it would be a healthy thing for US politics.</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.city-journal.org/html/16_1_reagan.html[/url]”>http://www.city-journal.org/html/16_1_reagan.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Definitely a good thing. As a Republican, I know that one of the things I hear a lot is that our party hates minorities. However, the GOP is an equal opportunity employer. For some reason the Dems don’t seem to see that, and neither (for the most part) do the voters.</p>

<p>I am really happy Swann is running. Not only do I think he’s a great man for the job, but he’s also a Steeler! WE’RE GONNA WIN THE SUPER BOWL!!!</p>

<p>Hopefully we get the minority votes we need in the GOP. It would really be good for the party and for America in general.</p>

<p>The GOP is actually very diverse. I have an Arab-American friend, two Jewish friends, an an African-American friend who all support the GOP and President Bush. All four of these guys would be stereotypically classified as Dems, but stereotypes are for losers!</p>

<p>All three have leads in recent polls, all three are solid conservatives (especially Blackwell), and all three face significant obstacles. Swann’s up against an incumbent, Steele’s running in one of the bluest states in America, and Blackwell has to deal with the “legacy” of the worst governor in the nation.</p>

<p>great website if you don’t know it - good place to quickly review day’s articles and opinion pieces <a href=“http://www.realclearpolitics.com/[/url]”>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>That’s one of my firsts–every morning, BG.</p>

<p>No interest in black Republicans here at CC?</p>

<p>Do you think that all Blacks are democrats? </p>

<p>Do you select your candidates because of name recognition, sex, color, ethnic background, religion, where they live, send their kids to school, or their wealth?</p>

<p>Do you select the candidates? Does some shadowy person actually makes the selection? or Do candidates select themselves? </p>

<p>Unfortunately we select candidates who can win, not necessarily who can lead.</p>

<p>I’m missing your point, ITM. I think these particular candidates are interesting, in a macro-political way. What do you think?</p>

<p>Historically, post reconstruction, the vast majority of African Americans DO identify themselves as Democrats. This is based on the widely held perception (right or wrong) that “the Democratic party is the party of INCLUSION, and the Republican party is the party of EXCLUSION”, to quote my dear 72 year old father, who has long been an active member of the NAACP. As long as the larger AfAm community holds this perception of the GOP, the Democrats can continue to take the black vote for granted. I for one, feel that it’s advantageous to look slant-wise at ALL political candidates, whatever their party affiliation, and vote according to my own perceptions of the platform, voting record, and general political philosophy of each individual running for office.</p>

<p>In a macro-political way, it really doesn’t matter does it?</p>

<p>I, for one, am going to send a contribution to these candidates. I’m familiar with all three and they’d be excellent public officials. I’m particularly hoping that the Steelers win the Superbowl - I think it will give a boost to Swann. Ed Rendell is a machine politician from Philadelphia - not a bad governor but not good either.</p>

<p>Rendell was a very good mayor of Philadelphia. He is the consumate schmoozer, and that’s a very very important quality for a big city mayor. As governor, he’s suffered the fate peculiar to Pennsylvania governors–you somehow get sucked into the machinery and disappear. Think Tom Ridge. It’s curious that someone as gladhanding and gregarious as Rendell could suffer such a fate, but it’s a weird thing about PA politics. I’m really enthused about the prospects of a Swann governorship. I think his fame and his exuberance might break the cycle, and make for some interesting changes.</p>

<p>Not being a resident of PA, but a fairly frequent driver on its two main E-W arteries (I80 and the turnpike), I would be in favor of any governor who would get PennDOT to actually finish the construction projects that seem to go on for years and years. I have not found anything like it in any other state that I have traveled.</p>

<p>Sorry for the semi-hijack. Now back to the OP.</p>

<p>Steele is just another died-in-the-wool Red and Maryland doesn’t need any more Republicans, thank you very much. Erhlich was an abberation, and it was the white males who, in greater numbers, fell for his ‘top manager’ campaign (look up the voting percentages if you don’t believe me). Now he’s trying to sell our carefully-preserved parkland to his developer cronies, just to name one tiny example of his out-of-touch BS. Slashed the education budget and now is counting on short memories in an election year to save his hide - beefing up all of the spending in the areas he previously decimated with the temporary excess revenues. It isn’t working for Arnold, it won’t work for him either.</p>

<p>I am waiting to find a “Defeat Erhlich!” (and anyone who looks like him, or not, in the case of Steele) bumper sticker for my collection. I might not have room on the Beetle, which reaches the widest possible audience in rush hour - it may have to go on the dog show van.</p>

<p>If anyone on CC had suggested wanting a “Defeat Obama” (and anyone who looks like him) bumper sticker that would have been considered a horribly racist thing, and the thread would soon have been filled with page upon page of recriminations. I’m not holding my breath, here.</p>

<p>I’m very pleased to be able to say that my own Montgomery County Republican Committee–at the epicenter of Soccermom Central–has endorsed Lynn Swann for governor. This is going to get interesting.</p>

<p>My advice - move to Frederick County.</p>

<p>The Swann candidacy in Pennsylvania will no doubt be fascinating. From what I can tell he’s an honorable man. Always admired him for turning his back on the bright lights of California. He lived in Pittsburgh all year round from his rookie season onward.</p>

<p>Steele has been treated terribly by the Democrat establishment in Maryland.</p>

<p>Blackwell makes me suspicious because of the various allegations of bias by him as a campaign leader and Secretary of State in year 2004.</p>

<p>Can someone answer this question? Condelezza Rice is a Black Woman, she is the secretary of state. isnt she black whether or not shes a conservative or not? Somehow the majority of black people think your not black unless you are a liberal i just dont get it</p>

<p>Blacks were historically Republicans well after Reconstruction. The big shift happened around 1932, if memory serves. (My memory of things I’ve read, that is; I have no actual memories of 1932.)</p>

<p>Blacks were loyal to the Republican Party for many decades; it was, after all, the Party of Lincoln, the “Great Liberator”, and the Democratic Party of the 19th century was largely responsible for rollback of civil rights known as Reconstruction. </p>

<p>By 1932, the black unemployment rate had hit 50%. The Roosevelt administration enacted a great many programs designed to provide relief to unemployed workers, black as well as white. Many of these programs specifically prohibited racial discrimination in their eligibility requirements.</p>

<p>Truman brought more black voters into the Democratic fold by desegregating the military. Kennedy’s endorsement of civil rights legislation, and Lyndon Johnson’s enactment of really significant civil rights legislation, further cemented the reputation of the Democratic Party as the natural electoral home of black voters and politicians.</p>

<p>White southerners had also been part of the traditional New Deal coalition, partly for older historical reasons (the “Party of Lincoln” was not exactly an endorsement in some circles), and partly because New Deal programs poor whites in the South (e.g. rural electrification programs like the one that established the Tennesee Valley Authority).
But Lyndon Johnson correctly predicted that the Democratic Party would lose the white voters in the South for a generation as a cost of the civil rights legislation. </p>

<p>Some southern politicians (like Strom Thurmond, who had run on an openly racist platform when he headed the openly Dixicrat ticket in 1948, but had returned to the Democratic Party) switched to the Republican Party largely as a result of Lyndon Johnson’s embracement of civil rights. Thurmond switched in 1964, but for many former “yellow dog Democrats,” George Wallace’s American Independent Party in 1968 served as a kind of halfway house that allowed them to vote for a Democrat without voting for the Democratic Party. White voters in the South voted solidly Republican in 1972, and have largely done so since then, even though the Democratic Party has nominated a significant number of white southerners to its national ticket since that time (Carter in 1976 and 1980, Clinton and/or Gore in 1992, 1996 and 2000, and John Edwards in 2004). </p>

<p>Reagan acted to a large degree as though he couldn’t be bothered to try to include black voters in his coalition. (Announcing that he was running for president in Philadelphia, Mississippi, notorious as the site of the murders of four “Freedom Riders,” may be the most conspicuous example.) George H.W. Bush continued that impression with the “Willy Horton” campaign advertisements. (I saw that as opportunism more than anything else; his earlier support of the United Negro College Fund, and even his appointment of Clarence Thomas, lead me to believe that he was more personally interested in reaching out to black voters, though the treatment of Anita Hill didn’t end up winning him any credit in the black community, particularly among black women.) </p>

<p>In recent elections, the black electorate has voted for Democrats on the national ticket by a margin of about nine to one. (Considering that even Strom Thurmond managed to get 22% of the black vote the last time he ran for reelection, that’s a shockingly low number.)</p>

<p>George W., Karl Rove, and others in the Republican Party of late, seem to have sensed an opportunity to move some of those black voters into the Republican column. W.'s appointments of Colin Powell and Condi Rice to positions of real prominence and power have attracted some attention. </p>

<p>My own sense is that there is a real opportunity here for the Republican Party to continue to distance itself from its recent tactic of using coded racist messages like the Philadelphia Mississippi announcement and the Willy Horton campaign, and attract a larger number of black voters to the Republican ranks. I suspect that the percentage of Republican voters among blacks in the military is significantly higher than 10%, though the mishandling of the war in Iraq is likely to erode Republican progress there. Many middle class black voters have relatively conservative views on issues like abortion and gay marriage that aren’t a natural fit with today’s Democratic Party. I know some high income black people who resent paying high taxes, and have become Republicans (my father-in-law and brother-in-law, for example, who enjoy razzing me for my liberal views almost as much as Driver and Fundingfather do).</p>

<p>I view the Republican move to nominate more black candidates for public office as a positive sign, and agree that some of the rhetoric directed at some of these candidates from some members of my party has been appalling.</p>