<p>I think “recurrent phenomenon” was correct for whatever question that was.</p>
<p>What about “Why was the theory perceived as so novel?” or something?</p>
<p>i want to say it was “instance of recurrent phenomenon”
but this time, i’m not 100% positive :P</p>
<p>@aiginqinf</p>
<p>The question was Why did the gate theory prove shocking?</p>
<p>The answer was because it was so novel.</p>
<p>the question was actually something like “why was the theory so shocking”
the answer was that because its strategies were so novel, or something like that.</p>
<p>Why wasn’t the answer to one of the questions in the Descartes passage (i dont remembe the specific one XD) “irreverent to the theory”? He was criticizing how it doesn’t really address all the situations and the new theory was generally accepted.</p>
<p>The passages tone wouldn’t have been describe as critical though. It was more about how the gate theory improved Descartes theory, which isn’t all that irreverent.</p>
<p>It was the one about why it was so shocking, and you’re referring to the answer that it “diminished Descartes’s reputation” or something along those lines.</p>
<p>But it can’t that, because the article never said anything about his reputation. Additionally, it wouldn’t have damaged his reputation because he was still so close to being correct over 1000 years before, when they didn’t have all the technology and stuff we do.</p>
<p>Thanks guys. I put novel for the “why was it so shocking,” but looked back at the passage like 10 times.</p>
<p>^^I see.</p>
<p>10char</p>
<p>Just thought I would compile everything that we have
Passages
Grandma Letter Essay
Read the first half.
[UUSM</a> - Services & Sermons](<a href=“http://www.uusm.org/services/012107.php]UUSM”>http://www.uusm.org/services/012107.php)
Alaska
Page 11 is the passage, Sat reworded some things differently.
[Momzillas</a> - Google Books](<a href=“Momzillas: A Novel - Jill Kargman - Google Books”>Momzillas: A Novel - Jill Kargman - Google Books)
Tribulation
You have to log in to Amazon to view the passage, which is page 42 to 44.
<a href=“https://www.amazon.ca/Little-Friend-Donna-Tartt/dp/1400031699/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1295842635&sr=8-1#reader_1400031699[/url]”>https://www.amazon.ca/Little-Friend-Donna-Tartt/dp/1400031699/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1295842635&sr=8-1#reader_1400031699</a>
Pain
Pages 121 and 122, Sat omitted some of the info in the passage.
[Complications:</a> a surgeon’s notes on … - Google Books](<a href=“Complications: A Surgeon's Notes on an Imperfect Science - Atul Gawande - Google Books”>Complications: A Surgeon's Notes on an Imperfect Science - Atul Gawande - Google Books)
Satchel Paige
This is a part of the passage on page 22.
[Don’t</a> look back: Satchel Paige in … - Google Books](<a href=“http://books.google.com/books?id=LT2pirW9nSYC&lpg=PA22&dq=satchel%20paige%20goat&pg=PA22#v=onepage&q&f=false]Don’t”>http://books.google.com/books?id=LT2pirW9nSYC&lpg=PA22&dq=satchel%20paige%20goat&pg=PA22#v=onepage&q&f=false)
Environmental Ecotourism
I could not find this, but I didn’t see anyone having a problem with this one.
Chlorophyll Plant
I couldn’t find this one but the answers are backed up by the consensus so there’s no need.
Compilation
Passages (Source and thanks, ivycraze and posters on this thread)
-Alaska:
Idyllic – sesame street
“fancy schools” and “apartment buildings to get into” reveal about the author’s attitude
Facing issues now</p>
<ul>
<li><p>Pain:
What was the purpose of the passage? using modern research for an old idea
Why using bell phrase: reinstate a comparison
Based off Lines whatever through whatever, what does descartes theory of pain state? purely physical reaction to bodily injury
What would supporter of the 2nd theory, gate theory (not Descartes) say to the end questions? Was it new devices haven’t been developed so they can’t find the problems OR stressing? I said new devices since it’s the supporters of the 2nd theory. They could NOT answer why the brain feels pain with stimulus, so they are not going to say stressing. </p></li>
<li><p>Environmental:
Conducted – preformed
author of passage 2 would respond to the author of passage 1? evidence for a need of education</p></li>
<li><p>Satchel Paige:
birth certificate and the bible? supporting evidence
What would the author of Passage 1 respond to the Satchel Paige’s claim “I did nothing to stop it.”
I put like he contributed to the stories
unnecessarily trivial
conversational</p></li>
<li><p>Tribulation:
What was “resolute” about the Tribulations passages? She was so sure or something/determination?
What did the example of the chandelier in Tribulation serve to do?
example of recurrent phenomenon
What did the Ceeve family believe the purpose of memories was?
Palatial
protect cherished beliefs</p></li>
<li><p>Grandma Letter Essay:
Why did the grandma learn to write love?
I put to contribute more directly to letter
“and i was off to the races” indicate?
b) the narrator enthusiastically went to work
depicting the formative stage of the development of the writer
self- satisfied (definitely, she was glad of taking over her g-ma’s live not conscientious: characterized by extreme care and great effort) she said she breezily took over
What was the purpose of the parenthesis (it talked about Californians and hockey)</p></li>
<li><p>to show the writer catering to her audience
used “8 1/2 by 11” paper?"
Needed more space.
Resignation – it was not resolve. The question asked for the whole sentence, which included she then signed. (or was it two sentences?)</p></li>
</ul>
<p>Sentence Completion (Source and thanks: dark knight)
- Unpredictable
- Recognized … Considerable
- Diminutive
- Proximity
- Hardy
- Reconcile … Dogmatic (Does everyone agree? Or was it polemical)
- Surmise … Deed (the historian)</p>
<h2>8. Arrested … preserved (the artist)</h2>
<ol>
<li>Honors</li>
<li>Opinion … Argue</li>
<li>Deleterious (new vaccine)</li>
<li>Eschew … Adhere (Native American potters)</li>
</ol>
<h2>13. Indelible (Nutcracker)</h2>
<ol>
<li>Increasing awareness</li>
<li>Welfare … reputation</li>
<li>Prodigy … Exceptional</li>
<li>Mirrors … Evoke</li>
<li>Meteoric </li>
<li>Anomalous (particles differed from the norm)</li>
</ol>
<p>aw man for that daughter grandmother passage i put despair… because it said she was sighing and stuff =/ </p>
<p>why can’t it be despair? it doesn’t seem too extreme in the context.</p>
<p>just wondering wut would -5 points (not questions) be usually for CR score</p>
<p>There was a question about what the author’s opinion on “chronic”</p>
<p>and what was the misunderstanding choice in the purpose of the g-ma passage?</p>
<ol>
<li>Honors
and 15. Welfare … reputation</li>
</ol>
<p>I’m not remembering those two. Were they easier questions?</p>
<p>I remember they were the first question for two of the three sections so yes</p>
<p>do you think the curve’s gonna be generous? </p>
<p>what would 5 wrong be?</p>
<p>What is the “resolute” question in the tribulation passage…</p>
<p>I think it’s something like “In what way are the myths resolute.”</p>
<p>Arent they passed down?</p>
<p>@violinplayer ?
Remember that the post is #1190</p>