<p>For the flow of metal through soil passage: 1) was a screen placed so that only liquid could flow through? 2) was the dripping liquid measured in volume? Because it was mg/L?</p>
<p>Yes and yes.</p>
<p>was it mass of metal and volume of water? or volume of metal??</p>
<p>any one else felt that this science was definitely easier?</p>
<p>I first picked mass of metal in volume of water, but then changed it to volume of metal in volume of water. Pretty confident that was correct, could be wrong though</p>
<p>I thought it was much easier, but seeing everyone’s post about how difficult it is really making me doubt myself… I think I didn’t understand something orsomething. I know I got a couple wrong already :(</p>
<p>@Treyinator Volume of metal? But it was in mg/l, right?</p>
<p>i put mass of metal, volume of water…anyone else?</p>
<p>mg of metal/Liter of water… i see what youre saying. i got it wrong, damn.</p>
<p>I got the same as ketann</p>
<p>how about the conserved one? i put it wasnt conserved…but i forgot the explanation.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Neutral + Neutral = (+) + (-)</p>
<p>0 charge both sides… Isn’t that conserved?</p>
<p>mass is measured in (mg)
volume (mL)
so I said mass of metal and volume of liquid</p>
<p>and yes
0 + 0 = (+) (-) </p>
<p>which ends up being 0=0 so yes it is conserved I said</p>
<p>What did you guys put for the viscosity one?</p>
<p>blood was lower because of more viscosity</p>
<p>What did you guys put for what resembles v0? I put V1. But i think it was Vr</p>
<p>I put vL? Didn’t it say VL was balanced and stable and it said v0 was balanced and stable too</p>
<p>which scientists thought there was something wrong with the theory? 1 and 2 only correct?</p>
<p>That is correct</p>