<p>Just doodling….</p>
<p>The politics of posting:</p>
<p>-1. The poster who prefers their world and their reflection in it</p>
<p>–even as it is–but is open, even anticipating improvement and remedy while enjoying the benefits such as they are–which they often have in surplus–of our political/cultural traditions and the progress so engender in themselves and the world they’ve been located in (think Leibniz, ‘best of all possible worlds’). They are often defensive of it, even if joyously so.</p>
<p>-2. The poster who, longing for equality and ‘social justice’ is appalled with their world as currently convened,</p>
<p>looks into the mirror of life disgruntled and distempered, and in such displeasure cries out for deliverance, if not revolutionary change in general and in particular, with the clarion call, ‘look at me, look at my world, this ruinous world…of mine (think ‘secular-puritans’…in earnest). They are often aggressive and angry, even if inspired and affable.</p>
<p>-3. The poster, who, though empathetic to category #2–in principal–is living a version of the bourgeoisie dream </p>
<p>and is, in this sense, aligned with those in category #1, while finding those who speak loudly or at all a disturbance to be avoided in such social occasions as they find themselves…they tend towards the quaint and whimsical and would prefer to agree to disagree so as to attend to the regularly scheduled programming (think ‘late Victorian-libertine’ or, apropos the 21st century, Oprah). They tend to be a majority and throw their moral weight around appropriately (though they would shrink away from the term “moral”).</p>
<p>BTW, I fancy myself in 1, fascinated by those in 2, while deeply sympathetic to those in 3.</p>