<p>I think it’s in all of the academies. My son is friends with a “doolie” and depending on how his superiors come back from their night out (happy drunk vs. mean drunk) heavily influences their activities for the next day. What a great example of “lead by example.” :(</p>
<p>These are college kids with college problems. As Nurseypoo stated it is in all of the academies as it is on all college campuses. Doesn’t make it right but it is a fact. Any parent who thinks having their kiddo attand a Service Academy, that they will not be faced with alcohol, needs to get their head out of the sand.</p>
<p>On the other hand, in varying degrees, many in America would prefer to impose a rule, develop a standard, or pass legislation to “fix” perceived problems and THEN stick their head in the sand as if the problem had been fixed.</p>
<p>We send 18-year olds to war [and 19-year old fire big guns] but we don’t let them drink.
We spend billions on drug interdiction without regard to whether or not simple marijuana possession should be a crime or not.
We withhold birth control devices and still have a teen pregnancy rate higher than most other countries.
We spend billions more on education than mos tother courntires and still lag behind others in science and math.</p>
<p>If you haven’t taught your child how to be be alcohol responsible by the time he enters the Academy, the Academy shouldn’t be charged with that task. They’ve set a rule down, it should be followed, but I don’t know what good the rule accomplishes.</p>
<p>The problem becomes, in a manner of speaking, that the college years for many IS the time to learn how to deal with alcohol. If you are not permitted to make mistakes now, while in college, then the consequences can be much more serious if you are in some foreign country having too much to drink for the first time.</p>
<p>When I read the next part of the report where it indicated that there had only been 0.4% found legally drunk, i thought the same, the policy must be working.</p>