<p>Here are some information from the American Heartland that I found interesting.</p>
<p>We used to live in northwest Ohio and I was looking at the website for the current Representative for the U.S. House from my former home. It can be characterized as mainly rural with a few small cities (35,000 - 50,000). The representative posts his service academy nomination information via press releases. Based on the number of nomination applications received each year, if a candidate is qualified, he/she is likely to receive a nomination to any of the service academies of his/her choice. It appeared that in the past 4 years the limit of 10 nominations per academy slot was reached twice. This happened for nominations to the USNA in 2005 and the USMA in 2003.</p>
<p>For the current admission cycle, there are 9 nominees listed with a total of 16 nominations given. Seven were awarded 2 nominations and the other 2 were awarded 1 nomination. For the 9 nominees the breakdown between academies were as follows:
7 - USMA (5 with 2 nominations / 2 with 1 nomination)
4 - USAFA (4 with 2 nominations)
3 - USMMA (3 with 2 nominations)
2 - USNA (2 with 2 nominations)</p>
<p>I then looked at history (3 additional years were available) to see if there were trends. Here are the results (using the same order as above).</p>
<p>2005: 13 Nominees / 27 Nominations (5 received 3 or 4)
8 - USMA
5 - USAFA
4 - USMMA
10 - USNA</p>
<p>2004: 11 Nominees / 26 Nominations (5 received 3 or 4)
8 - USMA
6 - USAFA
5 - USMMA
7 - USNA</p>
<p>2003: 15 Nominees / 23 Nominations (3 received 3)
10 - USMA
7 - USAFA
0 - USMMA
6 - USNA</p>
<p>With only 4 years of data, trends are difficult to determine. But it seems that in the past year there has been a decrease in overall interest in the academies in this Congressional District. However, it seems like the ones that applied are more focused on what they want. This year the nominees applied for only 1 or 2 academy nominations compared to several that requested 3 or 4 nominations in the past. It appeared that there was a strong preference for USMA (7 out of 9) in 2006, which was surprising considering the bad press given to the Army due to the ongoing war. Another suprising observation was that in 2006 none of the nominees received (and likely requested) a nomination(s) to both USMA and USNA. In the past, about 50% of the applicants received (requested) nominations to both USMA and USNA.</p>
<p>Overall number of applicants declined by 31%.
- Drop in 2006 applications; 9 nominees compared to past average of 13
- USMA; interest level down in '06; 7 nominations to past average of 9
- USAFA; interest level down in '06; 4 nominations to past average of 6
- USMMA; interest level constant in '06; 3 nominations to past average of 3
- USNA; interest level down in '06; 2 nominations to past average of 8</p>
<p>The historical strong preference for nominations to USNA seems to have declined sharply in 2006, while other academies have gained favor or remained at historical levels among the applicants from this Congressional District. This may be a result of the overall decline in nomination applications skewing the numbers for 2006.
- USMA; 44% of nominations in '06 vs. past average of 34%
- USAFA; 25% of nominations in '06 vs. past average of 24%
- USMMA; 19% of nominations in '06 vs. past average of 12%
- USNA; 12% of nominations in '06 vs. past average of 30%</p>
<p>Before anyone suggests that I am trying to say that one of the Academies is better than another. That is not my intent. I feel that each is a fine institution and I am grateful for all of the Cadets and Midshipmen that take up the challenge of attend one of the Service Academies and serve our great nation. I know and respect current Midshipmen from this Ohio Congressional District and my current Congressional District in Texas.</p>
<p>God bless all of the Academy Cadets and Midshipmen, and service men and women and their families.</p>