<p>I know that it is done differently now due to the affirmative action debate but is this an accurate predictor of the admissions process. They said 100 points would get you accepted and 90 or below would probably be a rejection and that between 90 and 100 would probably be a waitlist</p>
<p>Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003)[1], was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy. In a 63 decision announced on June 23, 2003, the Supreme Court ruled the university’s point system was too mechanistic and therefore unconstitutional.</p>
<p>This is not a good predictor of present admissions. It does illustrate the sorts of things that Michigan emphasizes, which are grades and curriculum, but there is no formula now.</p>
<p>It is also not true that 100 would get you in. The admit point varied from year to year, sometimes from week to week depending on the number of applications.</p>
<p>I think it’s pretty much the same thing now regardless of what the ‘official’ stance is. Having a high “Michigan” GPA and test score will still get you in. And being a URM with decent or even below average stats will still get you in, probably with some kind of scholarship.</p>
<p>78 (GPA)+20 (Scholarship Athlete)+11 (sat) +8 (school)+extracurricular activities, haha it is bad that they don’t accept students by this table :)</p>
<p>Yeah HAHAHAHAHA, you guys do realize that if you’re an in-state student who goes to a good public school and take a rigorous courseload, this chart would indicate that you would get into UMich even if you performed relatively poorly in school and on standardized tests.;)</p>
<p>You stilll need a 3.6 or better … which isn’t that easy at the top public school with a rigorous courseload … unless you are an URM or have a socio-economic disadvantage.</p>