Adult literary classic novels rewritten for little kids

FYI “KinderGuides”: adult novels recast as picture books for little kids.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/18/business/media/forget-pat-the-bunny-my-child-is-reading-hemingway.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=second-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

Why???

What adult novel do you suggest for a terrible remake as a kiddie picture book?

I nominate “Sophie’s Choice”

Children’s book retelling:
Sophie’s parents lose their jobs, and the family must move into a tiny apartment. Sophie is forced to decide which of the two family pets to euthanize.

We used to get classic graphic books in comic form in the young adult section when our kids were in grade school. The stories included “The Hobbit,” “Oliver Twist,” and many more. The plot and much of the vocabulary was identical, but the pictures made it easier for the kids to get through.

It was like this:

https://www.amazon.com/Oliver-Twist-Barrons-Graphic-Classics/dp/0764134906#immersive-view_1482132144830

Personally, I don’t see the point of totally changing the plot and call it the same title. It just seems like a wholly different story.

I know why it’s done - because these classics are beyond copyright protection so anyone can make a buck off them. I don’t mind them coming out as $2 thrift editions, but who allows these people to significantly alter the words of the author?

It just seems very wrong to me. I wouldn’t patronize anything that distorts the books in this manner.

Lolita. Let’s see their interpretation of that.

Simplified versions of classics have been around for many decades. I remember getting an F on a book report in fifth grade because I had written about a classic novel, and my teacher thought that I had used the simplified version from the third-graders’ section in the library. We were not allowed to write our book reports on books below our grade level, thus the F. I had to bring in my personal copy of the real, unabridged novel to get my grade adjusted.

Simplified versions of classics have been around for centuries. Lambs Tales from Shakespeare was written in 1807—and I’m a huge fan. What tot who attended a Christian Sunday school hasn’t listened to Bible stories that left out a lot of the seamy or complicated stuff?

Whether it’s good or bad depends on the quality of the adaptation.

Lady Chatterley’s Lover.

This reminds me of the episode of Friends in which Phoebe found out what really happened to Old Yeller.

Oedipus

I remember reading simplified versions of Les Miserables and Phantom with my kids before we went to the Broadway show. It was definitely worthwhile!

Medea (the children’s version has a happy ending)

Not to be conused with Madea

Fanny Hill.

Actually, I love the idea about children’s retellings of books – just not certain books. I grew up on Tales from Shakespeare.

I think there is room for abridged versions of adult books, but not bowdlerized ones.

Joyce’s Ulysses.

My children, who are now graduated from top LACs, credit the TV show Wishbone for the bulk of their knowledge of classic literature.

I loved Reading Rainbow! It was a fun show and shared love of reading without dumbing down or changing plots of books.

Paradise Lost

@college_query, Wishbone?! Boy, that brings back great memories!