<p>I have seen this common and misleading reply all across this sub-forum:</p>
<p>“The Ivies are unpredictable”
The Ivies take in their applicants based on SAT scores, grades, leadership, awards, activities, and volunteer hours. Their selective choices are not arbitrary - they simply pick the best 8-20% of applicants. They are completely predictable and respectable in their selections. </p>
<p>That being said, this type of response is usually used to say “I don’t know, but I’m replying here only because you offered to chance me back.” Another synonymous phrase that is essentially the same is “The Ivies are crapshoots.” Please avoid using this, and instead employ SAT trends, and the Ivy standard of ECs and grades. You can get a feel of this through research, or by observing “result” threads of many schools. For example, harvard, yale, and princeton - check these out.</p>
<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/princeton-university/318707-official-princeton-rd-decisions-class-11-a-7.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/princeton-university/318707-official-princeton-rd-decisions-class-11-a-7.html</a>
<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/harvard-university/681434-official-harvard-university-2013-decisions-thread.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/harvard-university/681434-official-harvard-university-2013-decisions-thread.html</a>
<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/yale-university/616404-official-yale-2013-scea-results-thread-2.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/yale-university/616404-official-yale-2013-scea-results-thread-2.html</a></p>
<p>Another horrible reply I’ve seen is
“I know someone who got in with similar stats” in defense of someone with sub-par scores. Facts are facts, standards are standards. Every kid gets in for a reason. </p>
<p>Another thing - if you don’t know anything about the statistics of schools - don’t even chance! I’ve seen tons of kids (usually with <50 posts) give predictions that simply aren’t realistic. A 2050 SAT 1 Asian applying to harvard, with no stellar ECs? NO! </p>
<p>Lastly - we’re here to give accurate predictions based on concrete trends and statistics. No point in giving false hope. And no point in looking for false hope.</p>
<p>Anyways, happy chancing! Perhaps the quality of chancing will increase.</p>