After taking my first ACT Practice test, is it worth taking the actual test?

<p>Already ED to Penn, so this ACT would primary be for my back up Tufts-Science and Arts
Here are my SAT scores
M:730
R:660
W:730</p>

<p>I took the first practice test of “Cracking the ACT 2013” and scored</p>

<p>E:28
M:32
R:34
Science:26</p>

<p>I was a little pressed for time and pacing was much different then the SAT which I spent many hours studying the critical reading section for. I’ve sign up for the Dec. 14th ACT test, so about 19 days I could study. My question is, is it even worth it? I don’t really know how to compare the test scores/judge if I’ll be able to beat my SAT scores (which again I don’t know how to compare).</p>

<p>After studying for two months straight for the SAT CR section, I went to a 640 to a 660 and really don’t want to waste anymore time test prepping. If this is in the wrong section, I apologize to the Mods, this is my first time posting.</p>

<p>You have a composite of 30 already on your first practice test that’s like a 2000 on the SAT. Your SAT score of 2130 is equivalent to 32 composite on the ACT. These are just rough estimates.
Your practice test composite is way better than my first practice test composite of 27. I ended up scoring a 33 on my first try. Imagine what you can achieve. At first i also had problems with pacing but with practice and more practice i managed. You can do the same. Just practice
And is it worth it ? YES. You have much time to easily increase and even beat your SAT Score.</p>