<p>Klout.com is a service that measures the online influence of individuals and brands. They put together a ranking of colleges that looks at how active they are in social media, how much buzz they get, etc., in Facebook, Twitter, and others.</p>
<p>The top 5 are: </p>
<ol>
<li>Texas A & M (73)</li>
<li>University of Wisconsin - Madison (71)</li>
<li>Harvard University (69)</li>
<li>University of Oklahoma (67)</li>
<li>Stanford University (67)</li>
</ol>
<p>Aggies probably leaped to No. 1 due to the whole jump to the SEC. Lots of discussion surrounding that…also Oklahoma’s courtship with the Pac-12.</p>
<p>Even as a supporter of the #2 school I have no idea what this means. Russell Wilson probably generated some of our traffic. Great guy/player but actual meaning in the global sense?? Not so much.</p>
<p>I think it has to do with frequency of #tag mentions on Twitter. Which makes this ‘study’ close to worthless, not because studies using data from Twitter are useless, but rather, this particular approach.</p>
<p>I’d guess sports is a major factor in social mentions. Texas A&M, though, has been working social media for a while. They were an early Facebook fan page adopter, for one thing. </p>
<p>A key factor is interactivity. A school that uses Twitter mainly to link to press releases or announce application deadlines won’t get as much traction as a school that monitors mentions and interacts personally.</p>
<p>Seems to me that this method is very susceptible manipulation by organized campaigns. Also, it cannot distinguish between fame and infamy. Both count equally as hits.</p>
<p>^^^ I agree. While anyone can count/rank data it doesn’t necessarily mean anything useful. I wouldn’t suggest using this as part of any criteria when choosing a college. I mostly associate ‘brand’ recognition with a company and its products/services.</p>
<p>Aggies are extreme super fans of their alma mater, so I’m really not surprised that they are number one on this “ranking.” Also Rick Perry being an alumni must have helped them, especially considering twitter hash-tags.</p>