<p>I would really have a problem with this:</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.nysun.com/article/63004[/url]”>http://www.nysun.com/article/63004</a></p>
<p>I would really have a problem with this:</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.nysun.com/article/63004[/url]”>http://www.nysun.com/article/63004</a></p>
<p>I didn’t read the link - but it just seems so wrong!</p>
<p>I agree entirely; no way should this be allowed to happen.</p>
<p>UNBELIEVABLE! Can anyone spell “chutzpah?”</p>
<p>I think it would be great. The very first pro-U.S. sympathy march following 911 (and I’m including the U.S.) was tens of thousands of Iranians gathered in Muhseni Square Tehran in a candlelight vigil. <a href=“http://groups.colgate.edu/aarislam/response.htm[/url]”>http://groups.colgate.edu/aarislam/response.htm</a></p>
<p>No such vigil was held in Israel, or Kuwait, or in Saudi Arabia.</p>
<p>Ahmadinejad just wants to get some ideas about what he wants to do to Israel.</p>
<p>why shouldn’t he go? </p>
<p>and our talk about Iran is ever so peaceful</p>
<p>our hypocricy astounds</p>
<p>"why shouldn’t he go? </p>
<p>and our talk about Iran is ever so peaceful</p>
<p>our hypocricy astounds"</p>
<p>Because Iran is the number one state sponsor of terrorism. The man calls for the destruction of our ally and, therefore, has no business at that sacred ground.</p>
<p>what!!! what about Sauid Arabia? Afghanistan? Pakastan? some people believe whatever they read</p>
<p>And we are calling for the destruciton of his country…</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a href=“http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jiygYbHl0aE-GV-juTvAZHtdz2Xw[/url]”>http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jiygYbHl0aE-GV-juTvAZHtdz2Xw</a></p>
<p>It looks like NYC has made the right decision.</p>
<p>"what!!! what about Sauid Arabia? Afghanistan? Pakastan? some people believe whatever they read</p>
<p>And we are calling for the destruciton of his country…"</p>
<p>CGM, who is calling for the destruction of his country, and why are these comments and the “hypocrisy” statement necessary to this discourse?</p>
<p>For what it’s worth, Iran promptly offered their condolences to the victims of 9/11.</p>
<p>He’s still not entitled to a photo-op. Monday should be an interesting commute. The NYPD said no, the Secret Service said yes, he said he’s going, and people are planning protests.</p>
<p>If we put the same people on this case that made Petraus out to be a wounded baby bird over the Move On thing, then we can certainly outmanuver(sp?) Iran in the propaganda department.</p>
<p>“Because Iran is the number one state sponsor of terrorism.”</p>
<p>With AKLCS Petraeus overseeing the ethnic cleansing of Baghdad, between 1.2 and 1.7 million dead, two million exiled refugees, and 1.5 million internal refugees, I don’t think that is even close to being true.</p>
<p>Iranians may have offered their condolences and had sympathy marches after 9-11…but until they stand up and condemn extremism in the name of their Islamic faith, they are ‘talking out of both sides of their mouth’. And I’m not interested in hearing it.</p>
<p>It’s not as if it’s just regular citizens of Iran who want to pay their respects. </p>
<p>We’re talking about a particularly militant leader who is leading the world to the brink of war. </p>
<p>
<a href=“A MONSTER WITH CHUTZPAH”>A MONSTER WITH CHUTZPAH;
<p>a leader leadning the world to war…hmmmm…who could she be talking about…</p>
<p>Ha, columbia is going to let him speak. Should be interesting to see how all the NY Jews react to the man who called the holocaust a lie and calls for the destruction if Israel.</p>
<p>Furthermore I bet security is tight as hell for this thing. You can’t march one of the most hated men in NYC down the street and expect nothing to happen…</p>
<p>I think it’d be funny if he was arrested as soon as he landed for his role in the 79 hostage crisis. Wont happen, but owuld be funny</p>
<p>CGM, are you suggesting that Ahmadinejad and Bush are morally equivalent?</p>