<p>
</p>
<p>Well, actually, I do get to pick and choose my laws, and I choose to deal with the consequences of doing so.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Then who does? Do you? Does a Congressman? Does a large aggregate of people unable to distinguish such laws then become a whole capable of doing so?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Many would argue that things like a drinking age, and prohibition on drugs is in conflict with the Constitution. I guess you don’t think so, and neither does the Supreme Court - at this point in time - but neither did the Supreme Court for a number of years before the laws finally started getting overturned. Are you telling me that they weren’t in conflict with the Constitution before they were overturned, and then suddenly were in conflict once they were overturned? Seems pretty contrived to me.</p>
<p>You should also note that my pot smoking is legal where I live. Funny that.</p>
<p>Vyse: Fascinating read there, the stages of moral development. I find it telling that one must advance to the point where one is able to reason about morality in a way other than “it’s illegal, therefore it must be bad.”</p>