<p>My father was in the hospital last week, and was discharged to home late Friday over my strenuous objections. I literally begged them to send him to a Subacute Nursing Facility. The last thing I said to the case manager was, “See you tomorrow” and on Saturday morning, sure enough, we went back to ER and after a lovely 10-hour day there, he was re-admitted.</p>
<p>This has happened to him 3 times in the last 2 years. </p>
<p>His post-discharge crises always happen within a few hours, and are exactly the sort of thing that could be handled at an SNF. (This time, it was uncontrolled back pain; another time, he wasn’t completely recovered from Rotavirus and was very weak and still having some continence problems.) These are things that 99.9% of people can get through at home with support, but he has no “reserves” (not sure what to call it) of strength or recuperative powers or overall good health to fall back on. On his best days, he’s near the red zone and a hospital stay knocks him off the tracks altogether and it takes him extra time and support to get back on. He needs to be completely, 100% well before he can go home.</p>
<p>He is fragile physically and mentally. He can do no aftercare for himself at all, and cannot follow discharge instructions. The Assisted Living staff can do a lot, but they can’t write an Rx for back pain, or hook him up with an IV drip for diarrhea-related dehydration. </p>
<p>The problem, I’m discovering, is that there is a hole in the insurance net. I’ve never disagreed in these cases that he’s well enough to be discharged. But Medicare guidelines about SNFs are very strict. I understand that (and as a taxpayer, appreciate it) – but that doesn’t help my dad. Home health care doesn’t kick in until a day or two later, by which time he’s back in the hospital. There seems to be nothing at all for someone who isn’t sick enough to be in an SNF, but isn’t well enough to be home. So he falls through the cracks. </p>
<p>Of course, it’s very stressful and upsetting when you’re 85 years old to have to go through what he went through on Saturday for the second time in a week, not to mention expensive for the insurer, and a waste of hospital resources. What infuriates me is that our 10 hours in the ER were completely predictable and avoidable. </p>
<p>It’s been suggested to me several times this weekend that maybe it’s time to consider moving him permanently into a nursing home. But he doesn’t (yet) need that level of care every day; it’s only post-hospitalization.</p>
<p>When I pointed out to the case manager on Friday night that this is a continuing pattern, she said just said over and over that he didn’t meet Medicare criteria. The new case manager for this second hospital stay said that the past doesn’t matter. I’m sure all of that is true. It still leaves the question: How can we get him the care that he needs for that transitional post-hospital period?</p>