<p>Originally, the lawyer was completelyA opposed to be evaluatedB by the review board, but she eventually compromisedC, stating she would allow questioning only by itsD senior members.
what is the mistake??</p>
<p>If the letters correspond to only the word preceding it (e.g. A-completely), then there are no mistakes.</p>
<p>I think D is wrong because “its” can’t stand for the lawyer.</p>
<p>^“its” is referring to the review board.</p>
<p>I think it is “B” if B is the whole phrase “to be evaluated.” I think it should read the lawyer was opposed to being evaluated…</p>
<p>it corrsponds tp the whole phrase</p>
<p>^if the above is the case, then I think it should be:</p>
<p>“Originally, the lawyer was completelyA opposed to BEING evaluatedB by the review board, but she eventually compromisedC, stating she would allow questioning only by itsD senior members.”</p>
<p>Right? BEING not “be”?</p>
<p>actually i dont know the answer,i am confused between A and e</p>
<p>it definitely has to be “being” not “be”… check this out</p>
<p>[to</a> being vs. to be - WordReference Forums](<a href=“to being vs. to be | WordReference Forums”>to being vs. to be | WordReference Forums)</p>