<p>Hi I was taking a sparknotes mini- SAT question, and I don’t understand their reasoning. Any help would be appreciated.</p>
<li><pre><code> Thousands of pages have been written about Alexander the Great since his death in 323 b.c. despite the fact that no contemporaneous, trustworthy sources exist; thus, writings about Alexander tend to be more a ‑‑‑‑‑ the writers personalities and beliefs than those of the man himself.
</code></pre>
<p>(A) discourse on
(B) reflection of
(C) biasing of
(D) collection of
(E) diatribe against</p></li>
</ol>
<p>I mean can’t there be multiple answers to this question? Sparks says the answer is b but i said d. Any thoughts?</p>
<p>Ok, contemporaneous means “present time”. So, since no contemporaneous sources exist, writings about the Alexander tend to be more of the reflection of the write than actual facts. </p>
<p>^ While that’s correct, collection of could technically also make sense with that explanation. That’s why the difference between the two choices is idiom, which makes reflection of correct.</p>
<p>‘more a reflection of the writer’s personalities and beliefs than those of the man himself’
the writings can be a ‘reflection of the writer’s personalities’
it cannot be ‘a collection of the writer’s personalities’ that does not make sense.</p>
<p>well, i would pick B because in writing, (say the book’s about Alexander) personalities and beliefs are reflected. If they were collected in a book, then the book would be a collection of beliefs and personalities which means it would be more of a biography… If beliefs are reflected, the book can still be about other ppl/things… my explanation may be way off but that’s how i looked at it.</p>
No. I don’t think a ‘writings about Alexander tend to be more a collection of the writers’ personalities and beliefs than those of the man himself’ makes sense either. If you look at what the whole sentence is saying - It is saying the writings are a reflection of the writers’ personalities and beliefs rather than a reflection of the personality and beliefs of Alexander. To substitute collection would mean you are saying the writings are a collection of the writers’ personalities and beliefs rather than a collection of the personality and beliefs of Alexander. </p>
<p>To me reflection makes sense. Collection makes no sense at all. </p>
<p>i got b too,i don see how D works, clearly the first sentence says that writers are trying to show alexander’s true thingies, i dont see how collection works here</p>