pbleic
#1
<p>Have no idea what their methodology is, but here we is the list from Project</a> Freshman</p>
<p>[ol]
[<em>]Princeton
[</em>]Harvard
[<em>]Yale
[</em>]Caltech
[<em>]MIT
[</em>]Stanford
[<em>]Amherst
[</em>]Swarthmore
[<em>]Wellesley
[</em>]Middlebury
[/ol]</p>
<p>Interesting. Embry Riddle #11 and Caltech ranked a second time at #12! hehe!</p>
sefago
#3
<p>well not hard- they basically used USNWR, and took the best 6 Universities and 4 colleges baring Williams College</p>
<p>AOL? They're still around?!</p>
<p>"AOL? They're still around?!"</p>
<p>Yeah, didn't you hear? They have changed their line of business to college rankings.</p>
<p>Embry Riddle = ?</p>
<p>Seems like a blog post, not a ranking.</p>
<p>More ranking bs.....geez.....it will sure bring out the ranking obsessed bees today!</p>
kwu
#8
<p>We approve of these "rankings," and the conspicuous absence of Williams amuses us.</p>
<p>What makes them so credible again?</p>
314159
#10
<p>Duke? Williams? Penn? Columbia? Chicago? This can't be accurate...</p>
<p>The format of the page itself is enough to discredit it. And the fact that AOL is attached to it.</p>
<p>In other news, was anyone else surprised that AOL still exists? I hadn't heard of it for at least a few years...</p>
<p>AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) is their only worthwhile feature....</p>
<p>^ That thing is a joke compared to Yahoo IM.</p>